DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ward, 726 So. 2d 17.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin Albert Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    10/9/98), ), writ denied, 00-3214 (La.
  • State v. Miller 269 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/9/98), ), writ denied , 00-3214 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince -Aka- Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    10/9/98), Defendant requested the following proposed jury instruction: The Court instructs the jury that the law looks with suspicion and distrust on the testimony of an accomplice or a snitch who provides evidence against a defendant for partial immunity from punish
  • State v. Prince 211 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/9/98), , Defendant requested the following proposed jury instruction: The Court instructs the jury that the law looks with suspicion and distrust on the testimony of an accomplice or a snitch who provides evidence against a defendant for partial immunity from punishment, or for pay, or for other personal advantage.
  • State of Louisiana v. Cody Keith Fontenot -Aka- Cody Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    30 10/9/98), the defendant requested the following proposed jury instruction: The Court instructs the jury that the law looks with suspicion and distrust on the testimony of an accomplice or a snitch who provides evidence against a defendant for partial immunity from punishment, or for pay, or
  • State v. Fontenot 207 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    10/9/98), , the defendant requested the following proposed jury instruction: The Court instructs the jury that the law looks with suspicion and distrust on the testimony of an accomplice or a snitch who provides evidence against a defendant for partial immunity from punishment, or for pay, or for other personal advantage.
  • State v. Hayes 70 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 3/11/98), 405 , writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    10/9/98), State v. Ayo, 08-468 (La.App.
  • State v. Dorsey 58 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 3/11/98) , , writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98), ; State v. Ayo, 08^68 (LaApp.
  • State v. BJB 983 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. B. J. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Ishmel Joel Ennis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/11/98), writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98)
  • State v. Ennis 877 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/11/98), , writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Langley 813 So. 2d 356 La. 2002
    3 Cir. 3/11/98) , (relying on Young ), writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98), ; State v. Thibodeaux, 97-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 3/11/98); , writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98); .
  • State v. Craft 796 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 3/11/98) ; -11 , writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98); , this court stated that: A review of reported decisions reveals that the courts have admitted confessions in situations where the defendant has admitted to using drugs shortly before the confession.
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/11/98) ; , writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98); , this court stated, "...
  • State v. Lormand 771 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/11/98) ; , writ denied, 98-955 (La.10/9/98); .
  • State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    App. 3 Cir. 3/11/98); , writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98); .
  • State v. Thomas 750 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-1072 (La.10/9/98), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Gaspard 746 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    10/9/98); (citations omitted; emphasis added): [T]he total percentage of a particular minority in the general population does not have a direct bearing on the makeup of the general venire, from which the grand jury venire is randomly drawn, and the grand jury foreman is selected.
  • State Ex Rel. Roper v. Cain 763 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3d Cir.3/11/98), , writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Varnado 753 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-1072 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , writ denied, 98-1072 (La.10/9/98), .
  • State v. Smith 740 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), -43 , writ denied 98-1072 (La.10/9/98), : When there is an indirect reference to the defendant’s failure to take the stand and testify, the court determines the remark’s intended effect on the jury.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    App. 3 Cir. 3/11/98), , writ denied, 98-0955 (La.10/9/98); , another first degree murder case involving the same attorneys and the same statistical information presented at the pretrial motion to quash, we rejected the defendant's claim of discrimination in selection of the grand jury foreman citing the failure to follow Young and establish a prima facie case.