Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Short v. Plantation Management Corp., 781 So. 2d 46.

22 citing documents.

Tate v. Kenny 186 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Perkins v. BBRC Investments, LLC 205 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 1 Cir. 12/27/00), ; Gibson v. Monroe Manor Nursing Home, 32,806 (La.App.
Health Education & Welfare Federal Credit Union v. Peoples State Bank 83 So. 3d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Holmes v. Hicks 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1 Cir. 12/27/00), .
James Pickering v. Dr. Dalmacia Paraguya La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Pickering v. PARAGUYA 9 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Singletary v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 982 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 12/27/00), .
Keith Singletary v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Curtis Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home D/B/A Camelot Leisure Living La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1st Cir. 12/27/00), contending in its brief that “an alleged violation of the NHRBR should not be deemed heritable unless the alleged violation is related to medical treatment.” Camelot’s basis for this bright line rule is the following quote from Short, “[i]n this regard, violations of the provisions of the Resident’s Bill of Right
Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home 965 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1st Cir.12/27/00), , contending in its brief that "an alleged violation of the NHRBR should not be deemed heritable unless the alleged violation is related to medical treatment."
Robert Neil Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center 930 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Norfleet v. LIFEGUARD TRANSP. SERVICE, INC. 934 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Davis v. ST. FRANCISVILLE COUNTRY MANOR 928 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 885 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 12/27/00) , -52 .
Thibodeaux v. STONEBRIDGE, LLC 873 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 12/27/00), 66 , an action against a nursing home alleging negligence and violations of the NHRBRL, the first circuit affirmed the "significant sum" of $238,813.94 in attorney fees, based on a 33-1/3% contingency fee contract between the plaintiff and her counsel.
Gibbs v. Magnolia Living Center, Inc. 870 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
App. 1st Cir.12/27/00), .
Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers 835 So. 2d 460 La. 2003
Explained Lapeyrouse v. Barbaree 836 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1st Cir.12/27/00), : Proof is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when the entirety of the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.
Hart v. Riverside Medical Center 835 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Pender v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. 817 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Clark v. Diamond B. Const. 803 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001