DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Transamerican Waste Co., 741 So. 2d 764.

17 citing documents.

  • David Brister v. E K Construction Company, Inc. & Lwcc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Cheryl F. Benoit v. Ace Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), addressed the issue as follows: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimants right to benefits.
  • Benoit v. ACE Transportation 51 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), , addressed the issue as follows: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimants right to benefits.
  • Larry Burns v. Interstate Brands Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), stated the following: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimant’s right to benefits.
  • Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp. 30 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), , stated the following: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimant’s right to benefits.
  • Gregory Scott v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), stated the following: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimant’s right to benefits.
  • Scott v. City of Pineville 8 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), , stated the following: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers’ compensation claimant’s right to benefits.
  • Kathy Bennett v. Pilgrim's Pride La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), stated the following: In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers' compensation claimant's right to benefits.
  • Bennett v. Pilgrim's Pride 972 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 6/2/99), , stated the following: *430 In order to avoid the imposition of penalties, an employer must reasonably controvert the workers' compensation claimant's right to benefits.
  • Clifton Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Maricle v. Sunbelt Builders, Inc. 916 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Marlena Alexander v. Autozone, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Alexander v. Autozone, Inc. 889 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Hills v. Cypress Bayou Casino & Royal 843 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 6/2/99) ; , Johnson sought penalties and attorney fees for its employer’s failure to pay workers’ compensation benefits.
  • Richard v. Workover & Completion 774 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • Phipps v. Bruno Const. 773 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 6/2/99); , we stated: An appellate court may not set aside the factual findings of a workers' compensation judge in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Ardoin 758 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 6/2/99); , a panel of this court stated: An appellate court may not set aside the factual findings of a workers' compensation judge in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.