Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Johnson, 759 So. 2d 257.

14 citing documents.

  • Keith Carranza v. Andrea C. Carranza La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 4/19/00), writ denied, 00-1425 (La.
  • Maxwell Perry Moore v. Aimee Paul Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 4/19/00), writ denied, 00-1425 (La.
  • Marvis Melvin v. Kimberly Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/19/00), writ denied, 00-1425 15 While Mr. Melvin questioned the quality of the new school Marvis Jr. attended, the only evidence on this point is the Sylvan findings that when Marvis Jr. was first tested, he was performing on a second grade level, and this increased to almost a fourth grade level after hi
  • Melvin v. Miller 181 So. 3d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/19/00) , , writ denied, 00-1425 (/La.5/31/00), ; Leger v. Leger, 03-419 (La.App.
  • Jaligam v. Pochampally 115 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • McLain v. McLain 974 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • Hsc v. Cec 944 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 4/19/00), , suggests, in a portion of the opinion entitled "Failure to Address Factors with Particularity", [6] that the answer is the former and that we may not assume that the trial court actually considered the twelve factors based on the fact that there was evidence in the record that would have permitted it to do so.
  • H.S.C. v. C.E.C. 944 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 4/19/00), , suggests, in a portion of the opinion entitled “Failure to Address Factors with Particularity” 6 , that the answer is the former and that we may not assume that the trial court actually considered the twelve factors based on the fact that there was evidence in the record that would have permitted it to do so.
  • Peacock v. Peacock 903 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    App. 3d Cir.04/19/00), , writ denied, 00-1425 (La.05/31/00), .
  • Leger v. Leger 854 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 4/19/00) , , writ denied, 00-1425 (La.5/31/00), .
  • Hoskins v. Hoskins 814 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    3d Cir.4/19/00), , writ denied 00-1425 (La.5/31/00), , the trial judge listed the child-relocation factors from La.
  • Nelson v. Land 818 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 4/19/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/31/00), (where good faith was found based on the new spouse having accepted a new job with a higher salary and better benefits); Brisbois v. Brisbois, 00-203, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Miller 799 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 4/19/00) ; , writ denied, 00-1425 (La.5/31/00); .
  • Richardson v. RICHARDSON (BLACKMAR) 802 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 4/19/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/31/00), .