Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 779 So. 2d 1070.

67 citing documents.

Rapp v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 926 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), (citing Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC, 186 F.3d 620 (5th Cir.1999), cert.
Gwendolyn Guillory v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
App. 3 Cir. 2/7/01), writ denied, 01- 637 (La.
Guillory v. Union Pacific Railroad 915 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir.2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), .
Schexnayder v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 899 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/7/01) , , writ denied, 01-0637 (La.4/27/01), , the court set forth the elements needed to prove the issues of typicality and adequacy: Typicality, Article 591(A)(3), means that "[t]he claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class."
Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 897 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/7/01) , , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), .
Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Bellsouth Mobility, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/7/01), writ denied, 01-637 (La.
Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY 875 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 3 Cir. 2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), (citing Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC, 186 F.3d 620 (5 Cir.1999), cert.
Daniels v. Witco Corp. 877 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
3rd Cir.2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), .
Betty Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., D/B/A Wal-Mart Supercenter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/7/01), writ 6 denied, 01-0637 (La.
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 870 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/7/01) , , writ denied, 01-0637 (La.4/27/01), .
Defraites v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 864 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
*260 App. 3 Cir. 2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), .
Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 2/7/01) , , writ denied, 01-0637 (La.4/27/01), .
Clark v. Trus Joist MacMillian 836 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 2/7/01) , , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01), ; Mayho v. Amoco Pipeline Co., 99-620 (La.App.
West v. G & H SEED CO. 832 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 2/7/01) ; , writ denied, 01-0637 (La.4/27/01); .
Mathews v. Hixson Bros., Inc. 831 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Duhe v. Texaco, Inc., 99-2002, p. 25 (La App. 3 Cir. 2/7/01); , writ denied, 01-637 (La.4/27/01); (quoting Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray, 208 F.3d 288, 296 (1st Cir.2000)).
Guillory v. Union Pacific Corp. 817 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 2/7/01), , writ denied, 01-0637 (La.4/27/01), , wherein the court, after a recitation and meticulous analysis of the history of the class action procedural mechanism, affirmed a class certification, noting that the principal justification for certification of a class under Rule 23(b)(3) is "the vindication
Duhé v. Texaco, Inc. 780 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 02/07/01) ; , the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.