Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sengsouly v. Allstate Ins. Co., 744 So. 2d 649.

13 citing documents.

  • Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/99), writ denied, 99-2526 (La.
  • Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Tessica Spears v. City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 6/9/99), writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99)
  • Spears v. City of Scott 915 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
  • John Nathan Thibeaux v. Chuck R. Trotter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) writ denied, 99-2526 (La.
  • Thibeaux v. Trotter 883 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Thonn v. Cook 863 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 6/9/99), , the appellate court found that a loss of consortium award of only $1,500.00 was not abusively low: The evidence in the record concerning Kien's claim for loss of consortium was sparse.
  • Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc. 832 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
  • LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 824 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 6/9/99) ; , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , an award for disability may include compensation for limitations on activities outside the workplace.
  • Carrier v. Nobel Ins. Co. 817 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir.); , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); .
  • Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 783 So. 2d 1276 La. 2001
    App. 3 Cir. 6/9/99), , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), ).
  • Hammock v. LSUMC 772 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    App. 3d Cir.6/9/99), , writ denied 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 760 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 6/9/99); -53 , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , this court stated: The role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact, and the adequacy of the award should be deter