Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sengsouly v. Allstate Ins. Co., 744 So. 2d 649.
-
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/9/99), writ denied, 99-2526 (La.
-
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co.
926 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
-
Tessica Spears v. City of Scott
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/9/99), writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99)
-
Spears v. City of Scott
915 So. 2d 983
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
-
John Nathan Thibeaux v. Chuck R. Trotter
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/9/99) writ denied, 99-2526 (La.
-
Thibeaux v. Trotter
883 So. 2d 1128
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
-
Thonn v. Cook
863 So. 2d 628
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 6/9/99), , the appellate court found that a loss of consortium award of only $1,500.00 was not abusively low: The evidence in the record concerning Kien's claim for loss of consortium was sparse.
-
Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc.
832 So. 2d 1141
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
-
LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana
824 So. 2d 422
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/9/99) ; , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , an award for disability may include compensation for limitations on activities outside the workplace.
-
Carrier v. Nobel Ins. Co.
817 So. 2d 126
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
App. 3 Cir.); , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); .
-
Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC.
783 So. 2d 1276
La. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 6/9/99), , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), ).
-
Hammock v. LSUMC
772 So. 2d 306
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App. 3d Cir.6/9/99), , writ denied 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
-
Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC.
760 So. 2d 492
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 6/9/99); -53 , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , this court stated: The role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact, and the adequacy of the award should be deter