Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blackmon, 748 So. 2d 50.

23 citing documents.

  • Explained State of Louisiana v. Gary L. Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); writ denied, 99-3328 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 11/3/99), writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00), where this court held that a fifteen-year-sentence (the maximum sentence at the time of the offense in that case) for vehicular homicide was not excessive based on the facts of the case.
  • State v. Morain 11 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 11/3/99) , , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00), , where this court held that a fifteen-year-sentence (the maximum sentence at the time of the offense in that case) for vehicular homicide was not excessive based on the facts of the case.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lorenzo Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/3/99), - 54, this court stated: In sentencing a defendant, the trial court must specifically state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Randall J. Morain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/3/99), writ denied, 99-3328 (La.
  • State v. Morain 981 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/3/99) , , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00), , where this court held that a fifteen-year-sentence (the maximum sentence at the time of the offense in that case) for vehicular homicide was not excessive based on the facts of the case.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin L. Stinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/3/99), writ denied, 99-3328 (La.
  • State v. Gourdine 946 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    3d Cir.11/03/99), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/28/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); writ denied, 99-3328 (La.
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Arthur Major III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00)
  • State v. Major 898 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State v. Delgado 845 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 11/3/99), , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00), .
  • State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    3d Cir.11/03/99), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/28/00), , the court found: As the defendant alleges no misunderstanding as to the nature of the charge pled and the plea colloquy demonstrates that the defendant had adequate information on which to enter an intelligent and voluntary plea pursuant to [ Boykin ], we conclu
  • State v. Tarver 846 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); -54 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/28/00); , this court explained: A punishment is considered constitutionally excessive if it "(1) makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and hence is nothing more tha[n] the purposeful and needless imposition of pain and suffering; or (2)
  • State v. Ballou 838 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); -54 , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State v. Cullipher 827 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); , a case with a similar fact scenario, wherein the defendant was sentenced to fifteen years for a conviction of vehicular homicide, this court stated: La.
  • State v. DEBECHE 815 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 11/3/99) ; , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State v. Fontenot 799 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    App. 3 Cir. 11/3/99); -54 , writ denied, 99 3328(La.4/28/00); , we said: Although not all aggravating and mitigating factors listed in Article 894.1(A) must be referenced by the sentencing judge, the record must affirmatively reflect that adequate consideration was given to codal guidelines in particularizing the defendan
  • State v. Hymes 787 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • Explained State v. Raffray 787 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/3/99) ; , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .
  • State v. Kezerle 789 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/3/99); , writ denied, 99-3328 (La.4/28/00); .