Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Ali, 733 So. 2d 1183.

19 citing documents.

Prejean v. Barousse 107 So. 3d 569 La. 2013
In re: Hughes, 03-3408 (La.4/22/04), ; In re: Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), .
Explained In re Adams 63 So. 3d 948 La. 2011
As we explained in In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The Canons [of the Code of Judicial Conduct] were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms [7the integrity of the judiciary.
In Re Frederic-Braud 973 So. 2d 712 La. 2008
According to In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The canons were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms the integrity of the judiciary.
Explained In Re Crawford 943 So. 2d 331 La. 2006
As we explained in In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The canons [of the Code of Judicial Conduct] were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms the integrity of the judiciary.
In Re Lee 933 So. 2d 736 La. 2006
cases referred to by the Commission include In re: Tuck, supra, as well as the following: In re: Doggett, 04-0319 (La.5/25/04), ; In re: Hughes, 03-3408 (La.4/22/04), ; In re: Clark, 03-2920 (La.2/20/04), ; In re: Sharp, 03-2256 (La.10/29/03), ; In re: Emanuel, 98-3142 (La.4/13/99), ; and In re: Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), .
In re Johnson 903 So. 2d 408 La. 2005
In In Re Judge Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), , the majority of this Court held that the minimum sanction of public censure was warranted for the failure to render timely decisions in fifty-six cases, failure to report seven cases under advisement, and failure to timely report the status of 34 cases under advisement.
Explained In Re Broussard 900 So. 2d 814 La. 2005
As we explained in In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The canons [of the Code of Judicial Conduct] were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms the integrity of the judiciary.
In Re Ellender 889 So. 2d 225 La. 2004
In re Wimbish, 98-2882 at p. 6 (La.4/13/99), .
In Re Hughes 874 So. 2d 746 La. 2004
See, In re Sharp, 03-2256 (La.10/29/03), (suspending a judge for 60 days without pay for failing to render a decision timely and for not listing cases under advisement on his reports to this court); In re Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), (censuring a judge for failing to render timely decisions in 56 cases and failing to report 7 of those cases to the Judicial Administrator as required by La.
In Re Clark 866 So. 2d 782 La. 2004
[4] The Commission referenced two decisional delay cases: In re Tuck and In re Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), .
In Re Davis 865 So. 2d 693 La. 2004
In re Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), ; In re Quirk, 97-1143 (La.12/12/97)
In Re Van Sharp 856 So. 2d 1213 La. 2003
In re: Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), .
In Re King 857 So. 2d 432 La. 2003
In re Wimbish, 98-2882 (La.4/13/99), ; In re Quirk, 97-1143 (La.12/12/97), .
Explained In Re Parro 847 So. 2d 1178 La. 2003
As we explained in In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The canons were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms the integrity of the judiciary.
In re Ali 829 So. 2d 1015 La. 2002
In re: Ali, 99-0659 (La.3/31/99), (hereinafter referred to as Ali II).
Explained In Re Shea 815 So. 2d 813 La. 2002
As we explained in In re: Wimbish, 98-2882, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , 1187: The canons were designed to promote a standard for judicial conduct that continuously reaffirms the integrity of the judiciary.
In re Brass 752 So. 2d 161 La. 2000
In re: Brass, 99-0607 (La.4/9/99), .
In re Dunn 754 So. 2d 919 La. 2000
DISCIPLINARY BOARD RECOMMENDATION Citing Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 23 3 and In re: Akilah Mawusi Ali f/k/a Connie Welcome-Sadler, 99-0659 (La.3/31/99), , the disciplinary board noted that an attorney’s period of probation does not begin until the requirements for reinstatement are satisfied.
In Re Emanuel 755 So. 2d 862 La. 1999
See In re Judge Paul R. Wimbish, 98-O-2882 (La.4/13/99), (handed down by this Court today in which we publicly censured Judge Wimbish for decisional delays and failure to report cases under advisement).