DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sportsman Store v. Sonitrol SEC. Systems, 748 So. 2d 417.

77 citing documents.

  • Brown v. City of Madisonville 5 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, pp. 6-7 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Brown v. Trask 998 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Ryan v. Zurich American Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 214 La. 2008
    Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201 (La.10/19/99), (citing Lirette v. State Farm Ins.
  • Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Louisiana Alligator Wholesale, Inc. v. Prairie Cajun Seafood Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 981 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-201 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Input/Output, Inc. v. WILSON GREATBATCH 977 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    See Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-C-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ("[t]he rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony"); Maraist & Lemmon, supra, p. 145 ("[i]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must assume that all of the affiants are credible .
  • Ernest Broussard, Indiv. v. Medical Protective Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Broussard v. Medical Protective Co. 952 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    he trier of fact, an appellate court may find manifest error if documents or objective evidence "so contradict the witness's story, or the story itself is so internally inconsistent or implausible on its face, that a reasonable fact-finder would not credit the witness's story[.]" Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, pp. 6-7 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Grant v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 952 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    See Sportman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasius, Inc., 99-C-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ("[t]he rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony"); Maraist & Lemmon, supra, p. 145 ("[i]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must assume that all of the affiants are credible .
  • Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Richard J. Murray, Jr., Et Ux. v. Town of Mansura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Murray v. Town of Mansura 940 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-201 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Systems, 99-0201 p. 6 (La.10/19/99), Lirette v. State Farm Ins.
  • McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Systems, 99-0201 p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ; Lirette v. State Farm Ins.
  • Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. 914 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-C-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ("[t]he rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony"); Maraist & Lemmon, supra, p. 145 ("[i]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must assume that all of the affiants are credible ...").
  • Frankel v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 923 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Zimko v. American Cyanamid 905 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), (citing Lirette v. State Farm Ins.
  • Jones v. Harris 896 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Murray v. Airborne Express/ABX Air, Inc. 888 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    755 So.2d at 236 (citing; Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, (La.10/19/99), .)
  • Green v. K-Mart Corp. 874 So. 2d 838 La. 2004
    Systems, 99-0201 p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ; Lirette v. State Farm Ins.
  • Hoerner v. ANCO Insulations, Inc. 812 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    See, i.e., Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201, pp. 6-7 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Dumas v. City of New Orleans 803 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    The Louisiana Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201 (La.10/19/99), , as follows: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be
  • Fontenot v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 787 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-201 (La.10/19/99); .
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 782 So. 2d 606 La. 2001
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems, 99-0201 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Darbonne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-0201 (La.10/19/99); ; James v. Gordon, 95-1472 (La.App.
  • Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. 755 So. 2d 226 La. 2000
    See Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 99-C-0201, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), ("[t]he rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony"); Maraist & Lemmon, supra, p. 145 ("[i]n deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must assume that all of the affiants are credible...").