DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 750 So. 2d 949.

18 citing documents.

  • In Re: Medical Review Panel of Hulan Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    11/19/99), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the possibility of a plaintiff recovering multiple caps for multiple injuries caused by multiple acts of malpractice.
  • Patricia Goff and Mark Goff v. Dr. Robin L. Yue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Mathew Whitehead v. Christus Health Central Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    1 Cir. 12/28/98), reversed on other grounds, 99-232 (La.11/19/99), correctly sets forth the law in this area: Since the Louisiana Legislature and the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Williams v. State, Department of Health and Hospitals, 97-0055 (La.12/2/97), have indicated that there shall be no distinction between the applicability of the privat
  • Marange v. Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. 93 So. 3d 1253 La. 2012
    See, e.g., Richard v. Richard, 11-0229 (La.10/25/11), ; London Towne Condominium Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), ; Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc., 01-2767 (La.1/28/03), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Stobart v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, Sevier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., *1259 West v. Bayou Vista M
  • Holloway v. State Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors of LSU 66 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that under certain circumstances, more than one cap can be awarded injuries to a single person, stating: “We find that the MLSSA does not prohibit multiple statutory caps for multiple acts of negligence which produce separate and independent damages.” Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Douglas v. Children's Hospital 69 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), , the court rejected the sort of “but for” analysis that would attribute all injuries back to the initiating problem that led to the questioned medical treatment.
  • Banks v. Parish of Jefferson 990 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    and Dev., XXXX-XXXX (La.2004), ; Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601 (La.2003), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX (La.1999), ; Ruiz v. Oniate, 1997-2412 (La.1998), ; Detillier v. Kenner Regional Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX (La.2004), .
  • Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 965 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1st Cir.12/28/98), , rev'd in part on other grounds, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Darvin Kerry v. State of Louisiana, Through Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    11/19/99), the supreme court stated: It seems elementary that, but for contracting sepsis, [the plaintiff] probably would not have developed the decubitus ulcers and the flexion contractures.
  • Kerry v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 935 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232, p. 6 (La.11/19/99), , the supreme court stated: It seems elementary that, but for contracting sepsis, [the plaintiff] probably would not have developed the decubitus ulcers and the flexion contractures.
  • Detillier v. Kenner Regional Medical Center 877 So. 2d 100 La. 2004
    and Dev., XXXX-XXXX p. 2 (La.2/25/04), ; Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601 p. 13 (La.7/2/03), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.11/19/99), ; Ruiz v. Oniate, 1997-2412, p. 4 (La.5/19/98), .
  • Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Without citing any such evidence, plaintiffs nevertheless argue that the instant case is analogous to Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, et al., 99-0232 (La.11/19/99) , in which the Supreme Court held that three separate caps applied to three separate acts of medical negligence under the Malpractice Liability for State Services Act (MLSSA).
  • Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 858 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center (Batson I), 99-0232, p. 11 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Armand v. State Department of Health & Human Resources 822 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    1st Cir.12/28/98), , rev'd, in part, on other grounds, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Williams v. O'NEILL 813 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), , and the cases cited therein.
  • Ruiz v. Oniate 806 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    See Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), .
  • Maraist v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 808 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, 99-0232 (La.11/19/99), (holding that La.
  • Batson v. SOUTH LOUISIANA MEDICAL CTR. 778 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center (Batson II), 99-0232, p. 1 (La.11/19/99), .