DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 748 So. 2d 423.

20 citing documents.

  • J. Patton Mabray, Jr. v. Sarah McSherry Mabray La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
  • Mary Beth Laird, Nee Walley v. John Carlton Laird La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • Laird v. Laird 268 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • In re Succession of Dysart 206 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • Kimberly Crittenden Daigle v. Merrill Lynch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    See Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723 (La.10/19/99), Manno v. Manno, 01-2138 (La.App.
  • Distinguished Daigle v. Merrill Lynch 107 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723 (La.10/19/99), ; Manno v. Manno, 01-2138 (La.App.
  • Distinguished Becnel v. Becnel 70 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    |nIn denying her claim for pre-judgment interest, Ms. Becnel contends that the trial court erred on relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723 (La.10/19/1999), as that decision only applies to equalizing payments which arise upon partition of the community.
  • Glynn P. Gremillion v. Anita Grimes Gremillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/19/99), Manno v. Manno, 01-2138 (La.App.
  • Distinguished Gremillion v. Gremillion 43 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723 (La.10/19/99), ; Manno v. Manno, 01-2138 (La.App.
  • Trahan v. Trahan 43 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Law Treatise, § 9.7, p. 255 (1999); see also, Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-0723, pp. 5-8 (La.10/19/99), -427 ; Manno v. Manno, 2001-2138, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • Branton v. Fox 968 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Donna C. Moore v. Charles L. Moore, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Moore v. Moore 917 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The trial court awarded Mrs. Moore judicial interest from the date of judgment but rejected her claim for prejudgment interest, on the basis of Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723 (La.10/19/99), .
  • Paige B. Sullivan v. Charles P. Sullivan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/19/99), the supreme court, quoting from its earlier decision in Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-110 (La.
  • Delahaye v. Delahaye 936 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-0723, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), , the Supreme Court held interest on an equalizing payment is not due until the date of the partition judgment, even when a substantial portion of the payment is attributable to a reimbursement claim.
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 892 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-723, p. 4 (La.10/19/99), , the supreme court, quoting from its earlier decision in Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-110 (La.7/1/97), , reaffirmed the difference between pre-judgment and post-judgment interest: The world of legal interest may be divided into two hemispheres.
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Knighten v. Knighten 809 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    2nd Cir.1/20/99), , affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 99-0723 (La.10/19/99), (expenses incurred by claiming spouse, including claiming spouse's refund of rent to lessees because claiming spouse decided to move into and enjoy the former family residence denied by trial court because expenditure made for claiming spouse's enjoyment of the former family residence); Stewart v. Stewart, 98-496, pp.
  • Ball v. Ball 757 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    This issue was recently resolved by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 99-0723 (La.10/19/99), which held that "prejudgment interest is not due on equalizing payments made under La.
  • Thomas v. Thomas 753 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Reinhardt v. Reinhardt, 31,174 (La.App.2d Cir.1/20/99), , rev’d other grounds, 99-0723 (La.10/19/99), .