DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Succession of Boyter, 756 So. 2d 1122.

129 citing documents.

  • Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors 879 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
    SWAT 24, XXXX-XXXX at 11, 808 So.2d at 302 ; Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Lockett v. STATE, DOTD 869 So. 2d 87 La. 2004
    Civ.Code art. 9; Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), -1129 .
  • Pepper v. Triplet 864 So. 2d 181 La. 2004
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co. 860 So. 2d 1112 La. 2003
    Succession of *1116 Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • In Re Succession of Jones 868 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.
  • Sidney Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00)
  • Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners 858 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Anthony Crane Rental, LP v. Fruge 859 So. 2d 631 La. 2003
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), (citing First Nat'l Bank of Boston v. Beckwith Mach.
  • Fauria v. Dwyer 857 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), , the Louisiana *1153 Supreme Court concluded that courts should give effect to language in a statute so that the language is interpreted in a manner which is consistent with logic and the presumed fair purpose and intention of the legislature.
  • Shell Oil Co. v. St. Charles Parish School Board 848 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See, Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co. 847 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.01/07/00), ; Stogner, supra .
  • Palmer v. BESE 842 So. 2d 363 La. 2003
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Hymel v. Department of Public Safety 843 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Therefore, after considering the statute in its |4entirety, and other ap *1174 plicable law, the provision in question must be interpreted in a manner consistent with “the express terms of the law and with the obvious intent of the legislature in enacting it.” Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Lotz v. Davis 815 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Jacobs v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU INS. 815 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In Re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), ; Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), .
  • In re Succession Coe 796 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • City of Pineville v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE 791 So. 2d 609 La. 2001
    In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), -29 .
  • Burnette v. Stalder 789 So. 2d 573 La. 2001
    See Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), (citing Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Dept. of Fin., 98-0601 (La.10/20/98), ; Hutchinson v. Patel, 93-2156 (La.5/23/94), ).
  • SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond 808 So. 2d 294 La. 2001
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Succession of McIntire 785 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Because Mrs. Mclntire executed the testament before January 1, 1996 3 and died after December 31, 1995, the issue of whether the Gurtners are forced heirs and the interpretation of the testament in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in In re Succession of Boyter, 99 -0761 (La.1/7/00), , are disputed.
  • Succession of Toncrey 769 So. 2d 1172 La. 2000
    The court of appeal, relying on this court’s decision in Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), , reasoned that because subsection (B)(1)(c) of La.
  • In Re Succession of Allison 766 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    GASKINS, J. This case was remanded for reconsideration in light the Louisiana Supreme Court's recent decision in Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/0), .
  • In Re Succession of Boyter 766 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • In Re Succession of Barthel 762 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Succession of Toncrey 763 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir. 8/18/99) ) was remanded to us “for *731 reconsideration in light of Succession of Boyter”, 99-0761 (La.1/7/0), .
  • Langlois v. EAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. 761 So. 2d 504 La. 2000
    Succession of Boyter, 99-0761 (La.1/7/00), ; First Nat'l Bank of Boston v. Beckwith Mach.
  • Succession of Allison 757 So. 2d 647 La. 2000
    IN RE: Williamson, Juliet Amelia; Anthony, Elisabeth Lloyd; Naylor, Barry Ashton; — Other(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 419,132; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31495-CA Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to consider in light of Succession of Boyter, 99-C-0761 (La.1/07/00), .