DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Edwards v. Daugherty, 747 So. 2d 1105.

20 citing documents.

  • Mona Leblanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 3/10/99); writs denied, 99-1393 and 99- 1434 (La.9/17/99); ).
  • LeBlanc v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 177 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    App. 3 Cir. 3/10/99); , writs denied, 99-1393 and 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); ).
  • Terry J. Trahan, Jr. v. Robert M. Buatt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    9/17/99), (citing Sebastien v. McKay, 94-203 (La.App.
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 883 So. 2d 932 La. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) , , writs denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99), .
  • Soileau v. Soileau 870 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/10/99), ,) writs denied, 99-1393, , 99-1434 (La.9/17/99), .
  • Steven B. Soileau v. Cynthia Bailey Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Oubre v. Eslaih 869 So. 2d 71 La. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/7/99), .
  • Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
    3 Cir. 1999) writ denied ; Durvernay v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Public Safety, (La.App.
  • Ryder v. Rowan Companies 845 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) , , writs denied, 99-1393 & 99-1434 (La.9/17/99), , wherein the Court explained the law applicable to the interpretation of statutes: In interpreting a statute, we must “consider all parts together, giving effect to all parts, if possible, and not construing as surplusage any sentence, clause or word, if a construction can be legitimately found which will give meanin
  • Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) ; , writ denied, 99-1393 (La.9/17/99); .
  • Green v. L & F Constr., Inc. 829 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir. 3/10/99); , writs denied, 99-1393 and 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); .
  • Bergeron v. STATE BOXING 829 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-1393, 99-1394 (La.9/17/99), ; Bergeron v. Blake Drilling & Worker Co., (La.App.
  • Baullion v. Old American Pottery Co. 801 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 3/10/99); , writs denied, 99-1393 and 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); .
  • SOUTHERN CASING OF LA., INC. v. Houma Avionics, Inc. 809 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 3d Cir.3/10/99), , writs denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99), .
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 776 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) ; , writs denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); .
  • Alexander v. Austin 771 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) , ; writs denied, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); ; (La.App.
  • Explained Pettifield v. Venture, Inc. 770 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir.); , writ denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); , we explained: The failure of a litigant to produce evidence within his reach raises the presumption that the evidence would have been detrimental to his case.
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 769 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) ; , writs denied, 99-1393 and 99-1434 (La.9/17/99); .
  • Voitier v. Church Point Wholesale Bev. Co., Inc. 760 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/10/99) ; , writs denied, 99-1393 and 99-1431 (La.9/17/99); .
  • Guidry v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 755 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3d Cir.3/10/99), , writs denied, 99-1393, 99-1434 (La.9/17/99), , "the statutory grounds for recusal in civil cases have not been amended by the Legislature" to either include `appearance of impropriety' as a grounds for recusal or to require recusal under subsection B of Article 151.