Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Benware v. Means, 752 So. 2d 841.

23 citing documents.

In Re: Ginger Evelyn Brazzel 2011 Inter Vivos Trust and Brazzel Testament Trust F/B/O Ginger Evelyn Brazzel La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
1/19/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that there was no error in a trial court’s exclusion of all witnesses, exhibits, and defenses by a defendant who had repeatedly failed to comply with pretrial orders.
Henry Carroll and Annie Carroll v. Dr. Mahmoud Sheikh-Khalil and P&S Surgical Hospital La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
1/19/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that there was no error in a trial court’s exclusion of all witnesses, exhibits, and defenses by a defendant who had 8 repeatedly failed to comply with pretrial orders.
Demechie Peterson v. Victor C. Rochon, Usaa Insurance Company, Danielle Little and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Teresa Jeffries v. Prime Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Thuy Tran, Wife of/and Thai Bui; Quan Hoang, on Behalf of His Minor Children, Brandon Hoang and Ryan … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
F. Patrick Quinn, III v. Edwin M. Palmer and Decatur Hotels, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Campos v. Unlimited Master Contractors, LLC 265 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Winding v. Bryan 148 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 1471A(2) and (3), and thus authorizes the “death penalty” sanction of dismissal in an appropriate case for violating a pre-trial scheduling order, the Louisiana Supreme Court has admonished that “this extreme penalty obviously should seldom be imposed and should be reserved for only the most flagrant case.” Benware v. Means, 99-1410, p. 8 (La.1/19/00), .
Schmolke v. Schmolke 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Spiers v. Roye 965 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Benware v. Means, 99-1410, pp. 12-13 (La.1/19/00), -49 .
Roccaforte v. Nintendo of America, Inc. 917 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Benware v. Means, 99-1410, p. (La.1/19/00), .
Lang v. Asten, Inc. 900 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/2000), .
Smith v. 4938 Prytania, Inc. 895 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
In another case, Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/00), , the Supreme Court considered whether a trial court judge abused his discretion in imposing harsh sanctions for a defendant's failure to comply with the obligations imposed by the court for the preparation of a pre-trial order.
Zavala v. ST. JOE BRICK WORKS, INC. 897 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir.1985); see Benware v. Means, 99-1410, p. 12 (La.1/19/00), .
Lewis v. Evans Quality Temps 859 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/00), p. 4, .
Watters v. Department of Social Services 849 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/2000), .
Brooks v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BD. 847 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/02), ; Horton v. McCary, 93-2315 (La.4/11/94), .
Gaskin v. Henry 830 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.01/19/00), , on remand, 93-0203 (La.App.
Coleman v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 815 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
*270 5 Cir. 6/27/01), , citing Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/00), .
Reeder v. New York Life Ins. Co. 790 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
NOTES [1] Benware v. Means, 99-1410, (La.1/19/2000) .
Chapital v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 780 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Benware v. Means, 99-1410, p. 6 (La.1/19/2000), .
Benware v. Means 760 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Benware v. Means, 99-1410, p. 14 (La.1/19/00), .
Bourque v. Allstate Insurance 760 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The appropriateness of penalties for disobedience of or disregard for court orders relating to pre-trial procedures is discussed by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Benware v. Means, 99-1410 (La.1/19/2000); .