Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 755 So. 2d 877.
- The Kullman Firm, a Professional Law Corporation v. Integrated Electronic Technologies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
-
Ruby McCall v. Louisiana Right of Way Services,inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
2/29/00), Orsot, ___ So.3d ___.
-
Luca Paul Orsot v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
2/29/00), -80, explained the meaning of exigible as follows: Black’s Law Dictionary defines an “exigible” debt as a liquidated and demandable debt; a mature claim.
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 242 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Dean Born v. City of Slidell
180 So. 3d 1227
La. 2015
The City also relies on Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), , wherein this court reinstated a ti-ial court’s denial of prescription in a suit for payment for compensatory leave earned prior to the employee’s retirement, and found that since pjaintiff was retired, “a claim for payment for compensatory leave did not become exigible until [plaintiff] retired.” Id.
-
Born v. City of Slidell
157 So. 3d 726
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The City concludes that Mr. Born’s action, filed nearly five years after the amendment, is untimely- In support, the City cites Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), .
-
Monroe v. Physicians Behavioral Hospital, LLC
147 So. 3d 787
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
In Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 1999-2061 (La.2/29/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the meaning of the word “exigible.” The court stated: Black’s Law Dictionary defines an “exi-gible” debt as a liquidated and demanda-ble debt; a mature claim.
-
Dill v. 32nd Judicial District Court Judicial Clerk's Fund
27 So. 3d 1056
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
The supreme court reached a different result based upon the specific facts in Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), .
-
Finova Capital Corp. v. Denmon's Louisiana Pharmacy, Inc.
908 So. 2d 1210
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
art. 3495, Comment (b); Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), .
-
Reed v. City of Baton Rouge
916 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
On appeal, plaintiffs, relying on Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), , argue that their claims for compensatory time did not commence to run until they retired or were terminated.
-
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU
898 So. 2d 1260
La. 2005
We addressed a similar issue in Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), .
-
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
898 So. 2d 1260
La. 2005
We addressed a similar issue in Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), .
-
Smith v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF EMP. RETIREMENT
851 So. 2d 1100
La. 2003
Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061 (La.2/29/00), -80 .
-
Claitor v. Delahoussaye
858 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
art. 3463; Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, 99-2061, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), -880 .
-
Wyatt v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd.
831 So. 2d 906
La. 2002
Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge, 99-2061, p. 5-6, (La.2/29/00), .