DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 755 So. 2d 226.

617 citing documents.

  • SJ v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 959 So. 2d 884 La. 2007
    See Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Sunbeam Corporation, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 960 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    See Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 at pp. 16-17 (La.2/29/00), (noting the court "must draw those inferences from the undisputed facts which are most favorable to the party opposing the motion"); See also Hebert v. St.
  • Family Worship Center Church, Inc. v. Solomon 958 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Rex Townsley v. Quality Marine Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2/29/00), -31, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of a summary judgment as follows: Our review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de novo.
  • Townsley v. Quality Marine Services, Inc. 963 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/29/04), -90 , writ denied, 04-2705 (La.1/07/05), , this court set forth the law applicable to the appellate review of summary judgments, stating as follows: *412 In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), -31 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of a summary judgment as follows: Our review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de novo.
  • Shelvin v. INTRALOX, LLC 957 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    See Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 at pp. 16-17 (La.2/29/00), (noting the court "must draw those inferences from the undisputed facts which are most favorable to the party opposing the motion"); See also Hebert v. St.
  • Robinson Bros., Inc. v. Carter 962 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, p. 17 (La.2/29/00), ; Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Halphen v. Borja 961 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), ; Shackelford v. State Farm Mut.
  • Jones v. State 956 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Sunbeam Corporation, 1999-2181, 1999-2257 (La.2/29/00), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/20/04), .
  • Hayne v. Woodridge Condominiums, Inc. 957 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that expert opinion testimony in the form of an affidavit or deposition can be considered on a motion for summary judgment, and stated as follows: Although it is true that an expert is subject to cross-examination at a deposition, affidavits are subject to challenge as well, by
  • DeMoss v. PINE HILLS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 954 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Lowrey v. Borders 954 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Earline Thierry, Et Vir. v. State of La., Thru the Dept. of Health & Hosp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    2/29/00), has considered this issue: [I]t follows that we now adopt the Daubert standards for admissibility of expert opinion evidence at the summary judgment stage, as do the federal courts.
  • Thierry v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals & University Medical Center of Lafayette 948 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, pp. 14-15 (La.2/29/00), , 235 has considered this issue: [I]t follows that we now adopt the Dau-bert standards for admissibility of expert opinion evidence at the summary judgment stage, as do the federal courts.
  • Grant v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 952 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00)
  • Simon v. Biddle 946 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Manasco v. National RR Passenger Corp. 948 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Latisha Simon v. Dr. Johnny R. Biddle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Mashburn Marital Trusts v. Mashburn Family Trust 951 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), 0 ; Allen v. State ex.
  • Lieux v. Mitchell 951 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Pomacino v. Benito 948 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Palmer v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. 945 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), .
  • State v. Allen 942 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Joseph Dalton Guidry v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Enoch Melton Cole v. State Farm Insurance Companies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2/29/00), : A motion for summary judgment will be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that the mover is entit
  • Guidry v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 942 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Guidry v. Lee Consulting Engineering, Inc. 945 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • Laney v. City of New Orleans 945 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    See also, Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Mitchell v. Geno 943 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 c/w 99-2257 (La.2/29/2000), ).
  • Robinzine v. LABOR FINDERS 943 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Crayton v. Central Storage Center, LLC 944 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Patricia K. McNeely v. Safe Haven Enterprises, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2/29/00), However, the opinion offered in this case does not do so as the absence of the factual basis on which the bare opinion is formed renders it insufficient to demonstrate that Safe Haven could prevail on the merits of its claim.
  • Vad Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/29/04), writ denied, 04-2705 (La.1/07/05), this court recounted the law applicable to the appellate review of summary judgments, stating as follows: In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), -31, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of a summary judgment as follows: Our review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de novo.
  • Loyton Courville, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/07/05), : In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), -31, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of a summary judgment as follows: Our review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de novo.
  • Explained Jane Foster v. Barbara Henshaw La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas 940 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/29/04) , , writ denied, 04-2705 (La.1/07/05), , this court recounted the law applicable to the appellate review of summary judgments, stating as follows: In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), -31 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review of a summary judgment as follows: Our review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de novo.
  • Explained Foster v. Henshaw 939 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Sharp v. Parkview Care Center, Inc. 940 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Mack v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. 941 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00)
  • State v. Chandler 939 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Derbes v. City of New Orleans 941 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/2000)
  • Hays v. Christus Schumpert Northern Louisiana 939 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Blankenship v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 940 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Chaney v. Home Depot, USA, Inc. 940 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Ott v. FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES 940 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 and 99-2257, p. 7 (La.2/29/00); .
  • Amos v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 936 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), .
  • Dumaine v. Gulf Group, Inc. 937 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    See Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, 99-2257 (La.2/29/00), ; Coto v. J. Ray McDermott, 99-1866 (La.App.
  • Fontenot v. Diamond B Marine Services, Inc. 937 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    2/29/00), ; Schroeder v. Supervisors of La.
  • Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity Nat. 948 So. 2d 84 La. 2006
    [10] See Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Sunbeam Corporation, 99-2181, p. 14 (La.2/29/00), , (It is appropriate for Louisiana courts to utilize the federal authorities in interpreting the Louisiana Code of Evidence.).
  • Grimaldi Mechanical v. the Gray Ins. Co. 933 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), .