Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Serv., 759 So. 2d 45.

34 citing documents.

Brian Mariana and Zachary Mariana Versus Magnolia Auto Transport, LLC, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, Nickolus Treadway, Usaa Casualty … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Rhoda Timpton v. Touro Infirmary and Dr. Richard L. Meyer … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Translated, this means that “the contra non valentem type of exception to prescription embodied in the discovery rule is expressly made inapplicable after three years from the alleged injury causing act, omission or neglect.” Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00)
Linda M. Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Linda M. Snavely, Ind. Obo B. Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC 184 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
omission or neglect.” Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
State in the Interest of M. R. v. S.F.H. - Natural Mother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/11/00), State in the Interest of J.W., 01-500 (La.App.
State ex rel. M.R. v. S.F.H. 25 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), ; State in the Interest of J.W., 01-500 (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Mr v. Sfh 25 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), ; State in the Interest of J.W., 01-500 (La.App.
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
No. 1, 99-2402, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9, n. 3 (La.10/21/97), n. 3 ; Whitnell v. Silverman, 95-0112, p. 6 (La.12/6/96), ; Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., In
Rabalais v. Nash 952 So. 2d 653 La. 2007
No. 1, 99-2402, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Kinchen v. Livingston Parish Council 959 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish *902 Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Randazzo v. LA. STATE UNIV. HEALTH SCIENC. 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Randazzo v. State, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
“the contra non valentem type of exception to prescription embodied in the discovery rule is expressly made inapplicable after three years from the alleged injury causing act, - omission or neglect.” Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Walker v. Bossier Medical Center 873 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
5th Cir.07/27/99), , writ granted, 99-2402 (La.11/19/99), , rev'd, 99-2402 (La.04/11/00), .]
Brenda Sue Carter, Et Ux. v. Gary Stephen Haygood, Dds La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Translated, this means that “the contra non valentem type of exception to prescription embodied in the discovery rule is expressly made inapplicable after three years from the alleged injury causing act, omission or neglect.” Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00)
Carter v. Haygood 865 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Translated, this means that “the contra non valentem type of exception to prescription embodied in the discovery rule is expressly made inapplicable after three years from the alleged injury causing act, omission or neglect.” Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 849 So. 2d 38 La. 2003
Citing Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), , the appellate court held LSA-R.S.
Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 959 La. 2003
No. 1, 99-2402, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
No. 1, 99-2402, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
In re Medical Review Panel of Conerly 833 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), , held that plaintiffs motion raising the constitutional issue by way of a written motion was sufficient to satisfy the requirement that unconstitutionality be specifically pleaded.
Overruled Lucas v. Tenet Health System Hospitals, Inc. 818 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Our contrary holding in Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), , is overruled.
In re Medical Review Proceedings of Ivon 813 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
at pp. 8-9, 788 So.2d at 1179 , citing Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
State in Interest of Jw 801 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), .
Overruled Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital 798 So. 2d 921 La. 2001
Our contrary holding in Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), , is overruled.
Webre v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of the Parish of Terrebonne 798 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Subsequently, in Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), , the supreme court noted that Branch was a transfusion case that occurred before the 1976 amendment to La.
In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses 788 So. 2d 1173 La. 2001
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402 at p. 5 (La.4/11/00), .
Trahan v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 778 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Halle v. Our Lady of Lake Hospital, Inc. 779 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No.1, 99-2402 (La.4/11/00), , provides the courts with guidance in the interpretation of the applicability of the prescriptive provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act.
Williams v. JACKSON PARISH HOSP. 768 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Serv., 99-2402 (La.4/11/2000), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., supra .
Krolick v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), .
Krolick v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HRS 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), .
Ginn v. Woman's Hosp. Foundation, Inc. 770 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 636 So.2d at 214 ; Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1, 99-2402
Liner v. Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent DePaul, Inc. 762 So. 2d 628 La. 2000
If the plaintiff elects to amend, the district court shall conduct proceedings according to law and consistent with the views expressed in Daniel J. Boutte, et al. v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District et al., 99-C-2402 (La.4/11/2000), Otherwise denied.