DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co., 765 So. 2d 1017.

105 citing documents.

  • Jacqueline Morrell v. Alton Fisher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., 95-2522, p. 8-9 (La.8/31/00)
  • Morrell v. Fisher 7 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8-9 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., 99-2522, pp. 6-10 (La.8/31/00), -1024 .
  • Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc. 999 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), (La.App.
  • Glod v. Baker 998 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ; (La.App.
  • Harris v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 997 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Groff v. SOUTHWEST BEVERAGE CO., INC. 997 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Robert Groff v. Southwest Beverage Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Barringer v. Robertson 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Kennedy-Fagan v. Estate of Graves 993 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the law on intentional infliction of emotional *266 distress.
  • Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 983 So. 2d 798 La. 2008
    Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), ; (La.App.
  • Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Travis J. Haas v. Ryan S. Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Haas v. Romero 977 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Doe v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. 978 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Terrance v. Dow Chemical Co. 971 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), , 1023 Accordingly, reviewing the jury instructions in their entirety, we find that the instructions were adequate, well-considered, and not erroneous or prejudicial.
  • Theodore Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Pratt v. STATE MEDICAL CENTER IN SHREVEPORT 953 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Company, 1999-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 947 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Narcisse Thibodeaux v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Johnson v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 946 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Co., 95-2522, p. 8-9 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Ardoin v. McKay 939 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Additionally, we are mindful of the supreme court's decision in Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Co., 99-2522, (La.8/31/00), , where the supreme court concluded that the appellate court should have addressed a particular issue in that litigation even though it had not been assigned as error.
  • David Bradley Ardoin v. Dr. Douglas McKay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    8/31/00), where the supreme court concluded that the appellate court should have addressed a particular issue in that litigation even though it had not been assigned as error.
  • Trahan v. Deville 933 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Timothy Trahan v. Douglas Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Almerico v. Dale 927 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • SCURRIA v. Griggs 917 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), , at 1023 n. 7.
  • Clark v. Acco Systems, Inc. 899 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Co., 1999-2522 (La.08/31/00), , citing
  • State v. Sprint Communications Co., LP 897 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), ; Greenfield v. Lykes Bros. S.S.
  • Poche v. Allstate Ins. Co. 900 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8-9 (La.8/31/00), , the Louisiana Court stated: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise *65 great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
  • Rathey v. Priority EMS, Inc. 894 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Simms v. Progressive Ins. Co. 883 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/2000), .
  • Medine v. Roniger 879 So. 2d 706 La. 2004
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), , this court noted the duty of reviewing courts to evaluate allegations of improper jury instructions "in light of the entire jury charge to determine if they adequately provide the correct principles of law as applied to the issues framed in the pleadings and evidence and whether they adequately guided the jury in it
  • Turner v. Dr. X 878 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2522, p. 22 (La.8/31/00), , the supreme court reiterated the necessary requirements for a finding of detrimental reliance: "In Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808 (La.11/27/95), , and cases cited therein, we recognized three elements required for the application of detrimental reliance: (1) a representation by conduct or work; (
  • Darlene Turner v. Dr. X La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    8/31/00), the supreme court reiterated the necessary requirements for a finding of detrimental reliance: “In Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808 (La.11/27/95), and cases cited therein, we recognized three elements required for the application of detrimental reliance: (1) a representation by conduct or work
  • Jefferson v. Soileau 864 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Hays v. State 856 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., 1999-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Glod v. Baker 851 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Hayes v. Entergy Corp. 850 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Greenfield v. Lykes Brothers SS Co. 848 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Nicholas v. Allstate Insurance Co., 99-2522, pp. 7-8 (La.8/31/00), -1023 .
  • Cousins v. Realty Ventures, Inc. 844 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Fuller v. Baggette 847 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Scott v. Dauterive Hosp. Corp. 851 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8-9 (La.8/31/00); , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.
  • Robinson v. Healthworks Intern., LLC 837 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Co., 30,735 (La.App.2d Cir.5/28/99), , rev'd on other grounds at 99-2522 (La.8/31/00), ; Deus v. Allstate Ins.
  • Duzon v. Stallworth 866 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 99-2522, p. 8 (La.8/31/00), .
  • Singleton v. St. Charles Parish 833 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Co., 99-2522, p. 1 (La.8/31/00), .
  • King v. Bryant 822 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 99-2522, p. 14 (La.8/31/00), .