Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sengsouly v. Allstate Ins. Co., 749 So. 2d 677.

15 citing documents.

Lynette Bayham and Adam Bayham v. State of Louisiana, through the Office of Group Benefits La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Knockum v. Waguespack 111 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Richardson v. Say, 31,989, p. 4 (La.App.2d Cir.7/22/99), , writ denied, 99-2493 (La.11/19/99), , cert.
Doe v. DELTA WOMEN'S CLINIC OF BATON ROUGE 37 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2nd Cir.7/22/99), , writ denied, 99-2493 (La.11/19/99), , cert.
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
Tessica Spears v. City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/9/99), writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99)
Spears v. City of Scott 915 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
John Nathan Thibeaux v. Chuck R. Trotter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Thibeaux v. Trotter 883 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc. 832 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/9/99) , , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 824 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/9/99) ; , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , an award for disability may include compensation for limitations on activities outside the workplace.
Carrier v. Nobel Ins. Co. 817 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
App. 3 Cir.); , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); .
Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 783 So. 2d 1276 La. 2001
App. 3 Cir. 6/9/99), , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), ).
Hammock v. LSUMC 772 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App. 3d Cir.6/9/99), , writ denied 99-2526 (La.11/19/99), .
Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 760 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 6/9/99); -53 , writ denied, 99-2526 (La.11/19/99); , this court stated: The role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact, and the adequacy of the award should be determined by the facts or circumstances particular to the case u