Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 763 So. 2d 575.
-
Todd v. Tate
928 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Gui-treau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570, p. 8 (La.5/16/00), -581 .
-
Gladys McKnight Starks v. American Bank National Association
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (see also Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), citing Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Dept. of Transp.
-
Starks v. AMERICAN BANK NAT. ASS'N
901 So. 2d 1243
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 11/5/03) , , (see also Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), ; citing Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Dept. of Transp.
-
Amy Chesne v. Mark M. Mayeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
5/16/00), citing Stobart v. State of Louisiana, through Department of Transportation and Development, 92-1328 (La.
-
Chesne v. Mayeaux
865 So. 2d 766
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), , citing Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Transportation and Development, 92-1328 (La.4/12/93), .
-
Bell v. Kreider
858 So. 2d 58
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, M.D., 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), .
-
Campo v. Correa
828 So. 2d 502
La. 2002
[17] In accord Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), .
-
Richard Ex Rel. Deville v. La. Ext. Care
809 So. 2d 1248
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570, p. 5 (La.5/16/00); .
-
Abbott v. LSU MED. CENTER-SHREVEPORT
811 So. 2d 1107
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, M.D., 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), .
-
Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Abbott v. Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport
811 So. 2d 1107
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, M.D., 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), .
-
Wesco v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center
801 So. 2d 1187
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), , the court answered a question it had left open in the LeBreton decision.
-
Campo v. Correa
797 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Plaintiff cites Guitreau v. Kucharchuk, 99-2570 (La.5/16/00), , for the proposition that for the prescriptive period to commence, 17the plaintiff must be able to state a cause of action both a wrongful act and resultant damages.