Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carrier v. Reliance Ins. Co., 759 So. 2d 37.
- Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Mouton v. Thomas
924 So. 2d 394
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
-
LeBlanc v. Aysenne
921 So. 2d 85
La. 2006
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00); ; Peterson v. Schimek, 98-1712, p. 5 (La.3/2/99); .
-
Lee v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America
900 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., 99-2573, p. 12 (La.4/11/00), ; Garcia v. St.
-
Davenport v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS.
897 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded the lower courts erred in holding that UM coverage existed because the plaintiff qualified as an insured under an exception to an exclusion contained in a policy endorsement.
-
Edwards v. Daugherty
883 So. 2d 932
La. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
-
Stanley J. Earthly v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029.
-
Earthly v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.
878 So. 2d 746
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
-
David Cloud v. National Automotive Insurance Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029.
-
Cloud v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE INS. CO.
875 So. 2d 866
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
-
Mayo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
869 So. 2d 96
La. 2004
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
-
Cadwallader v. Allstate Ins. Co.
848 So. 2d 577
La. 2003
Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
-
Southerland v. Continental Cas. Co.
837 So. 2d 712
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court answered this inquiry in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
-
McEachern v. Mills
826 So. 2d 1176
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), , the plaintiff was injured during the course and scope of his employment and sought damages under his employer's UM coverage.
-
Cadwallader v. Allstate Insurance Co.
818 So. 2d 1027
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573, p. 12 (La.4/11/00), .
-
Tedeton v. Simpson
795 So. 2d 451
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), ; Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, 93-0911 (La.1/14/94), .
-
Walker v. Clarendon National Insurance
791 So. 2d 162
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00); .
-
Husband v. Darby
772 So. 2d 359
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The supreme court granted writs and remanded the case to our court for reconsideration of our earlier decision in light of its decision in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573 (La.4/11/00); .
-
Dunn v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
768 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
DISCUSSION The precise issues presented in this case have recently been addressed by our supreme court in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
- Husband v. Darby 763 So. 2d 613 La. 2000