Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carrier v. Reliance Ins. Co., 759 So. 2d 37.

70 citing documents.

  • Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
  • LeBlanc v. Aysenne 921 So. 2d 85 La. 2006
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00); ; Peterson v. Schimek, 98-1712, p. 5 (La.3/2/99); .
  • Lee v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America 900 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Co., 99-2573, p. 12 (La.4/11/00), ; Garcia v. St.
  • Davenport v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. 897 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded the lower courts erred in holding that UM coverage existed because the plaintiff qualified as an insured under an exception to an exclusion contained in a policy endorsement.
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 883 So. 2d 932 La. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
  • Stanley J. Earthly v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029.
  • Earthly v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. 878 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
  • David Cloud v. National Automotive Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029.
  • Cloud v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE INS. CO. 875 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
  • Mayo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 869 So. 2d 96 La. 2004
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
  • Cadwallader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 848 So. 2d 577 La. 2003
    Co., 99-2573, p. 11 (La.4/11/00), ; Peterson, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
  • Southerland v. Continental Cas. Co. 837 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court answered this inquiry in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
  • McEachern v. Mills 826 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), , the plaintiff was injured during the course and scope of his employment and sought damages under his employer's UM coverage.
  • Cadwallader v. Allstate Insurance Co. 818 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573, p. 12 (La.4/11/00), .
  • Tedeton v. Simpson 795 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), ; Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, 93-0911 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Walker v. Clarendon National Insurance 791 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00); .
  • Husband v. Darby 772 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The supreme court granted writs and remanded the case to our court for reconsideration of our earlier decision in light of its decision in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Company, 99-2573 (La.4/11/00); .
  • Dunn v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 768 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    DISCUSSION The precise issues presented in this case have recently been addressed by our supreme court in Carrier v. Reliance Insurance Co., 99-2573 (La.4/11/00), .
  • Husband v. Darby 763 So. 2d 613 La. 2000