Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Marchetta v. CPC of Louisiana, Inc., 759 So. 2d 151.

14 citing documents.

Martha Holleman & Mike Holleman v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
4 Cir. 3/22/00), quoting La.
Charles Danna Versus Alexander Chestnut and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
McKeogh v. Healthcare Indem., Inc. 250 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/22/00), , 155, a medical malpractice case, observed that "[t]he 'single most important factor' for determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists is 'the right of the employer to control the work of the employee.'
Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 174 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/22/00), , quoting La.
Papania v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 108 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/22/00), , citing to our earlier decision in Guidry, supra, p. 9 n. 10, 661 So.2d at 1058 (stating that a clear legal error “cannot be waived by the defendants failure to raise the proper objection.”) The “plain and fundamental” or clear legal error, according to the Burnses in their brief, is that “the jury never got to
Mize v. VAN METER, MD & ASSOCIATES 973 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Berthelot v. Stallworth 884 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL v. Meadowcrest Hosp. 858 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 3/22/00) , , a medical malpractice case, this Court stated that "[t]he `single most important factor' for determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists is `the right of the employer to control the work of the employee.'" 99-0485, p. 6, 759 So.2d at 155 ( , 1225 (
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Tinoco v. Meadowcrest Hospital 858 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 3/22/00) , , a medical malpractice case, this Court stated that “[t]he ‘single most important factor’ for determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists is ‘the right of the employer to control the work of the |9employee.’ ” 99-0485, p. 6, 759 So.2d at 155 ( , 122
Seal v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 816 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 3/22/00) , , hearing en banc.
Fryson v. Dupre Transport, Inc. 798 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Coleman v. Acromed Corp. 779 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Campbell v. HOSPITAL SERV. DIST. NO. 1, CALDWELL PARISH 768 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by