Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite PREMIER REST. v. Kenner Plaza Shopping, 767 So. 2d 927.

19 citing documents.

Joseph Thomas and Carolyn Thomas v. Harold Bayonne and Advanced Surgery Center of Northern Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Latessia McClellan and Markethy McClennan Versus Premier Nissan L.L.C. D/B/A Premier Nissan of Metairie La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00), ); La.
Daphne Smith v. City Bank & Trust Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 8/29/00), this Court stated as follows: The initial determination, on a motion for summary judgment, is whether the supporting documents presented by the moving party are sufficient to resolve all material issues of fact, if they are not sufficient summary judgm
Smith v. City Bank & Trust Co. 271 So. 3d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 8/29/00), , this Court stated as follows: The initial determination, on a motion for summary judgment, is whether the supporting documents presented by the moving party are sufficient to resolve all material issues of fact, if they are not sufficient summary judgment should be denied.
Burns v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. 165 So. 3d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
King v. Pontchartrain Mortgage Co. 134 So. 3d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Thang Duc Bui v. Behrman Discount, Inc. 40 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , this Court stated: The initial determination, on a motion for summary judgment, is whether the supporting documents presented by the moving party are sufficient to resolve all material issues of fact, if they are not sufficient, summary judgment should be denied.
MacFadden v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 998 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Input/Output, Inc. v. WILSON GREATBATCH 977 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 8/29/00), , this Court stated as follows: The initial determination, on a motion for summary judgment, is whether the supporting documents presented by the moving party are sufficient to resolve all material issues of fact, if they are not sufficient, summary judgment should be denied.
Southern Marine Sales, Inc. v. Matherne 915 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , quoting Davis v. Specialty Diving, Inc., 98-0458 (La.App.
Christopher Handy, Etc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Handy ex rel. Handy v. Union Pacific Railroad 896 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
HANDY EX REL. HANDY v. Union Pacific R. Co. 896 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Blount v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 887 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Premier Restaurants, Inc. v. Kenner Plaza Shopping Center, L.L.C. 833 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Maurice v. Prudential Ins. Co. 831 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 8/29/00) , : A document which is not an affidavit or sworn to in any way, or which is not certified or attached to an affidavit, is not of sufficient evidentiary quality to be given weight in determining whether or not there remain genuine issues of material fact.
Schully v. Hughes 820 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 8/29/00), , 932-933: A document which is not an affidavit or sworn to in any way, or which is not certified or attached to an affidavit, is not of sufficient evidentiary quality to be given weight in determining whether or not there remains genuine issues of material fact.
Duhe v. Weber's IGA Store 800 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Harvey v. Francis 785 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by