Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 762 So. 2d 608.

16 citing documents.

  • Arrow Aviation Company, LLC v. St. Martin Parish School Board Tax Sales Dept. 218 So. 3d 1031 La. 2016
  • Jackson v. City of New Orleans 144 So. 3d 876 La. 2014
    See Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 970 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    [15] In Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), , the termination condition based on receipt of old age insurance benefits was found to unconstitutionally discriminate against employees over the age of 62 on the basis of age.
  • WORLD TRADE CENTER v. All Taxpayers 908 So. 2d 623 La. 2005
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, p. 9 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Young v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 902 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In addition, the supreme court in Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), , had struck down as unconstitutional that portion of La.
  • Peters v. General Motors Corp. 892 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.05/16/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found the portion of the prior version of R.S.
  • Oestringer v. City of New Orleans 876 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel 817 So. 2d 1 La. 2002
    After oral argument, but prior to rendering a judgment in that case, this Court decided Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Randazzo v. Boh Bros. Const. Co. 814 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Stroud v. Nursery 806 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00); .
  • State v. O'REILLY 785 So. 2d 768 La. 2001
    State v. Brazley, 00-0923, p. 6 (La.11/28/00), ; Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, p. 9 (La.5/16/00), ; Perschall v. State, 96-0322, p. 28 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Hubbard v. Lakeland Nursing Home 781 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99 2854 (La.5/16/00); .
  • Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1983); Manuel v. State, supra ; Pierce v. LaFourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), (where the supreme court held unconstitutional a workers' compensation benefit provision that caused disparate treatment of injured employees 62 years of age or older.); State v. Ferris, 98-2442 (La.5/16/00), (holding constitutional the underage DUI statute applicable to drivers under 21 years old.)
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel 765 So. 2d 325 La. 2000
    After this case was taken under advisement, we rendered our opinion in Pierce v. LaFourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La.5/16/00), .
  • Gorbaty v. Department of State Civil Service 762 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    .Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, p. 2 (La.5/16/00), citing Manuel v. State, 95-2189, p. 4-5 (La.3/8/96), .
  • Clay v. City of Jeanerette 768 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854, pp. 8-9 (La.5/16/00); , recently concluded that: The statute's application results in disparate treatment of employees over age 62 from employees under age 62 and thus constitutionally discriminates against those persons on the basis of age.