Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richards, 750 So. 2d 940.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Alexander D. Kirby La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State v. Johnson 244 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
09/17/99), ; State v. Grant , 47,365 (La.
State v. Mansfield 190 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Richards, 99-0067 (La.9/17/99), ; State v. Grant, 47,365 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/12), , writ denied, 2012-2279 (La.4/5/13), .
State v. Merwin 186 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , (1966).” State v. Richards, 99-67, p. 1 (La.9/17/99), (emphasis added).
State v. Lensey 182 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Richards, 99-0067 (La.9/17/99), ; State v. Grant, 47,365 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/12), , writ denied, 2012-2279 (La.4/5/13), .
State v. Armstead 159 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99); .
State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 2 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/22/11), , 965-966 {citing State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99)), (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review”); State ex rel.
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Spells 116 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 1 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 2 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Grant 105 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
In State v. Richards, 99-0067 (La.9/17/99), , the court discussed the waiver principle inherent in a defendant’s choice to take the stand and testify on his own behalf.
State v. Delanueville 90 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Richards, 99-67 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review”), State ex rel.
State v. Harrison 69 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
in proper circumstances silence in the face of accusation is a relevant fact not barred from evidence by the Due Process Clause.” State v. Richards, 99-0067 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Jones 862 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See also State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), (“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review”)
State v. Lee 844 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Whether a trial court objection was sufficient to preserve the issue for appellate review was recently considered by the Supreme Court in State v. Richards, 99-67 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Whether a trial court objection was sufficient to preserve the issue for appellate review was recently considered by the Supreme Court in State v. Richards, 99-67 (La.9/17/99), .
State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
App. 4 Cir. 7/21/99), , writ denied, 1999-2519 (La.2/25/00), ; see also State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 4 (La.9/17/99), ("An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review"), (La.
State v. Gray 764 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 2 (La.9/17/99); , State v. Brooks, 98-0693, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Dubroc 755 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In the recent case of State v. Richards, 99-0067, p. 2 (La.9/17/99); , the supreme court permitted an accused to be impeached by his "previous failure to state a fact in circumstances in which that fact naturally would have been asserted."