DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ash, 747 So. 2d 15.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Jason 787 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Cojoe 785 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    [2] Writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, *92 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir.2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 *37 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4th Cir.2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review applicable when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the li
  • State v. Ballansaw 769 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -668 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99) , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 766 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) ; , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Womack-Grey 764 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict her was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Boles 763 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99) , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. McCadney 761 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), -68 , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Tassin 758 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict her was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Griffin 756 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99); , unit denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .
  • State v. Laymon 756 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Spain 757 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Thomas 752 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Smith 752 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/10/99) , , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Crosby 748 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), , this court summarized the standard of review that applies when a defendant claims that the evidence produced to convict him was constitutionally insufficient: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 2/10/99), , writ denied, 99-0721 (La.7/2/99), .