Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Haddad, 767 So. 2d 682.

44 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerald Manchip White La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Ladarrius Hodge La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Treveon Robinson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Andre V. Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2129100), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1070, 121 S. Ct. 757, 148 L.Ed.2d 660 ( 2001).
State Of Louisiana v. Ricky Armentor La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Sherman R. Holloway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
See State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.2/29/00), U.S. cert.
State v. Gabriel 262 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Diaz 183 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 2, n. 2 (La.2/29/00), fn.
State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/5/07), , writ denied, 08-26 (La.5/30/08), (alteration in original) , this court recognized the general proposition that a witness’ right not to incriminate himself outweighs a defendant’s right to present a defense: Moreover, in State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jaymes Larmar Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Harris 157 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In P.T., 970 So.2d at 1259 , this court quoted State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Casaday 162 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Scott 136 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Taylor 123 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.2/29/00), .
State v. Howard 106 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/9/00), .
State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), -86 , cert.
State v. Brooks 58 So. 3d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.02/29/00), , cert.
State v. Henderson 58 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Cooper 42 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
When presented with a conflict between a defendant’s right to present a defense pursuant to the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and a potential witness’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, the Louisiana | ⅞1 Supreme Court “has consistently recognized the witness’s right not to incriminate [herself].” State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00) .
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Coleman 20 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1983); State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Longo 8 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.2/29/00), .
State v. Diggs 1 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.2/29/00), , U.S. cert.
State v. Lilley 996 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.02/29/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. P. T., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. P.T. 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Moreover, in State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Ross 973 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. PT 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Moreover, in State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Haddad, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Russell 966 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Haddad, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Lubom 963 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.05/17/06), , citing State v. Haddad, 1999-1272 (La.02/29/00), , cert.
State v. Grant 954 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Haddad, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Gibbs 935 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Hill 930 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.02/29/00), , cert.
State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
In State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle that it is impermissible to knowingly call a witness who will claim a privilege, for the purpose of impressing upon the jury the fact of the claim of privilege.
State v. Simton 847 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See, State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 5 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Simmons 817 So. 2d 16 La. 2002
See State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00)
State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[11] See, State v. Haddad, 99-1272 (La.2/29/00), , cert.
State v. Crotwell 818 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 9 (La.2/29/00), .
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
see also State v. Haddad, 99-1272, p. 6 (La.2/29/2000), , 2000 La.