Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brooks, 749 So. 2d 651.

18 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Margaret Camaille Stockstill La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Jaquan Battley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
11/ 12/ 99), and Hasten.
State v. Vansant 170 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2nd Cir.5/5/99), , writ denied, 99-1599 (La.11/12/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 5/5/99), writ denied, 99-1599 (La.11/12/99), after the first day of voir dire, but before the jury was sworn, a prospective juror who had not been questioned informed defense counsel that another prospective juror who had been questioned told her and other prospective jurors that the defendant would not have been charged had he not
State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 5/5/99), , writ denied, 99-1599 (La.11/12/99), , after the first day of voir dire, but before the jury was sworn, a prospective juror who had not been questioned informed defense counsel that another prospective juror who had been questioned told her and other prospective jurors that the defendant would not have been charged had he not been guilty and that his min
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
11/12/99), after the first day of voir dire, but before the jury was sworn, a prospective juror who had not been questioned informed defense counsel that another prospective juror who had been questioned told her and other prospective jurors that the defendant would not have been charged had he not been guilty and that his
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 5/5/99), , writ denied, 99-1599 (La.11/12/99), , after the first day of voir dire, but before the jury was sworn, a prospective juror who had not been questioned informed defense counsel that another prospective juror who had been questioned told her and other prospective jurors that the defendant would not have been charged had he not been guilty and that his min
Franklin v. Franklin 928 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
State v. Uloho 875 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
2 Cir. 5/5/99), , writ denied, 99-1599 (La.11/12/99), , which found that the prosecutor's remarks that defendant could have subpoenaed witnesses the State did not call was in response to defense counsel's closing argument, which raised the issue of the State's failure to subpoena a witness.
State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 3/24/99) , , writ denied 99-1422 (La.11/12/99), , (La.App.
State v. Brooks 838 So. 2d 778 La. 2003
State v. Brooks, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
State v. Felder 809 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), ; -79 (La.App.
State v. Brice 808 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 4/15/99) , -1238 , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 3/24/99), , writ denied, 99-1422 (La.11/12/99), .
State v. Hurst 797 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .
State v. Henderson 762 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.4/15/99), , writ denied, 99-1462 (La.11/12/99), .