Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guzman, 769 So. 2d 1158.

575 citing documents.

  • State v. Holder 87 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Dunn, 30,767 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Murray 86 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00), ; State v. Ashley, supra.
  • State v. Mastin 86 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Mosley 80 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1753, 1999-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Barton 80 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), ; State v. Ashley, supra.
  • State v. Diaz 81 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), ; State v. James, 42,976 (La.App.2d Cir.02/13/08), .
  • State v. Gill 80 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.
  • State v. Elmore 80 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1528, 1999-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.5/12/04), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writ denied, 2004-0597 (La.9/24/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul B. Stephan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    14:30.1A(2)(a), cannot “ „reasonably be viewed as having a material factor affecting the [defendant‟s] decision to plead guilty.[‟] [”] State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 11 (La.5/16/00), (quoting United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 301-02 (5th Cir.1993)).
  • State v. Stephan 79 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    14:30.1 A(2)(a), cannot “ ‘reasonably be viewed as having a material factor affecting the [defendant’s] decision to plead guilty.[’][”] State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 11 (La.5/16/00), (quoting United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 301-02 (5th Cir.1993)).
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.5/12/04), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writ denied, 04-0597 (La.9/24/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5/16/00), and State v. Jones, 99-122 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 80 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3d Cir. 6/24/98), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Caldwell 78 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00); ; State v. Ashley, supra.
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.5/12/04), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writ denied, 04-0597 (La.9/24/04), .
  • State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Garner 78 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1528, 1999-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.
  • State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further found that it had never extended the core Boykin constitutional requirements to include advice with respect to sentencing.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Roy Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.5/12/04), .
  • State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 70 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.5/12/04), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.App.2d Cir.1/28/04), , writ denied, 2004-0597 (La.9/24/04), .
  • State v. Wallace 71 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1528, 1999-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Harrison Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Thibeaux 70 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Watson 71 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Dunn, 30,767 (La.App.2d Cir.06/24/98), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Rockett 71 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Dunn, 30,767 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Enterkin 71 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 6/24/98), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    27 State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Craig 66 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 and 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), -66 ; State v. Gilliam, 01-748 (La.App.
  • State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1753, 1999-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Williams 69 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Colgin, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Price 66 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Our jurisprudence has never required that a defendant be informed that his guilty plea-his conviction-may be used as a basis for the filing of a future multiple offender bill.” In State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court confirmed that it has never extended the core Boykin constitutional requirements to include advice with respect to sentencing.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Thomas 63 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Dickerson 65 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 and 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), -66 ; State v. Gilliam, 01-748 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Drayton 63 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 1999-1753 (La.05/16/00), ; Livingston, supra.
  • State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 15 (La.5/16/00), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Boswell 62 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), ; State v. Lingefelt, 38,038 (La.App.2d Cir.01/28/04), , writ denied, 04-0597 (La.09/24/04), .
  • State v. Hanks 58 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Key 58 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Guzman, XXXX-XXXX, 1999-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. June, 38,440 (La.