Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Myers, 761 So. 2d 498.

50 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Antwan L. Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Trevor Marcel Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
4/11/00), State v. Hampton, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Myers, 99-803, p. 6 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Rodricus C. Crawford 218 So. 3d 13 La. 2016
4/11/00), (the trial court’s error in failing to address defense counsel’s Batson challenges warranted reversal of defendant’s conviction).
State v. Burse 169 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), -01 .
State v. Parker 141 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Id.; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.04/11/00), ; State v. Jones, 42,531 (La.App.2d Cir.11/07/07), ; State v. Coleman, 41,764 (La.App.2d Cir.01/24/07), , writ denied, 07-0459 (La.10/12/07), .
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), (where the Supreme Court found that the trial court observes firsthand the racial composition, demeanor, and general atmosphere of the voir dire, which simply cannot be replicated from a cold transcript).
State v. Henderson 135 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In support of this argument, he cites State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), , and State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
1859, 1866 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991); Sparks, 68 So.3d at 473 ; State v. Allen, 2003-2418 (La.6/29/05), ; State v. Jacobs, 1999-0991 (La.5/15/01), ; State v. Myers, 1999-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), addressed a situation in which the trial court declined to address a defendant‟s Batson challenge.
State v. Robinson 79 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1940 , 164 L.Ed.2d 669 (2006); State v. Myers, 1999-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court continued, citing State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , and reiterated the importance of the trial judge’s role when Batson challenges are made: The issue of purposeful racial discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges is a matter of utmost seriousness affecting not only the trial itself, but the perceived fairness of the judicial system as a whole.
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
In argument to this Court, the defendant claims the trial court failed in its duty “to address the challenge, either by ruling on whether a prima facie case of discriminatory Usintent has been made or by requiring race-neutral reasons for the strikes.” State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Holand 64 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 96 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Bess, supra, citing State v. Myers, 1999-1803 (La.04/11/00), .
State v. Breaux 55 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1940 , 164 L.Ed.2d 669 (2006); State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Juniors, supra; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Bess 47 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Juniors, supra; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Id., citing State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Myers, 99-1803, pp. 3-4 (La.4/1/00), -01 .
State v. Bourgeois 1 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), -501 , and cases cited therein.
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
This Court has reviewed Batson challenges in a criminal case on appeal, State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , and routinely reviews Batson challenges in capital cases on direct appeal.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
See, e.g. State v. Givens, 99-3518(La.01/18/01), ; State v. Myers, 99-1801(La.04/11/00)
State v. Lawrence 925 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), ; State v. Meyers, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Qualls 921 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Juniors, supra ; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Price 917 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Juniors, supra; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 6 (La.4/11/00), .
Harold Alex, Jr. v. Rayne Concrete Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
See State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), in which the supreme court held: [W]e hold the trial judge erred in not addressing defense counsel’s Batson objections and this error raises serious federal constitutional equal protection issues affecting the rights of both the defendant and the excused venirepersons.
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 915 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
See State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , in which the supreme court held: [W]e hold the trial judge erred in not addressing defense counsel's Batson objections and this error raises serious federal constitutional equal protection issues affecting the rights of both the defendant and the excused venirepersons.
State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
1712 ; State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), ; see also La.C.Cr.
State v. Magee 916 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 4 (La.4/11/00), .
Harold Alex, Jr. v. Rayne Concrete Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4/11/00), the supreme court found that the trial court committed legal error in prematurely concluding that there was no pattern of racial exclusion in the jury selection in this case.
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 902 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Further, in State v. Myers, 99-1803, (La.4/11/00), , the supreme court found that the trial court committed legal error in prematurely concluding that there was no pattern of racial exclusion in the jury selection in this case.
State v. Green 873 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), (quoting Batson, supra ).
State v. Crawford 873 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), 502 (quoting Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 828 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), (quoting Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Harris 820 So. 2d 471 La. 2002
State v. Myers 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
Citing the trial judge's subsequent retirement [7] and this court's recent decision in State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , defendant now requests that we remand for a new trial.
State v. Lewis 795 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , the Court discussed the necessity for the trial court to address Batson challenges: The issue of purposeful ...
State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
A trial judge may take into account not only whether a pattern of strikes against African-American venirepersons has emerged during voir dire but also whether "`the prosecutor's questions and statements during voir dire examination and in exercising his challenges may support or refute an inference of discriminatory purpose.'" State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 5 (La.4/11/00), (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 97 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
See generally State v. Myers, 99-1803, pp. 5-6 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Bourgeois 786 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
challenges and Batson challenges in State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.01/17/01), and State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , respectively.
State v. Givens 776 So. 2d 443 La. 2001
This court recently addressed the same problem in the context of Batson challenges in State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), , where we discussed the necessity for the trial judge to address these challenges when made by the defendant.
State v. Jones 767 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
Adams v. Canal Indemnity Co. 760 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Myers, 99-1803, p. 6 (La.4/11/00); .