Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Alexis, 770 So. 2d 339.

259 citing documents.

State v. Lee 826 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
App. 4 Cir. 12/20/00), , 590 quoting State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Melancon 826 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Ricks 823 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), , 342-43, cert.
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that "`[he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances, the defendant is a victim of the legislature's failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.'" State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), (quoting State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
State v. Dickerson 822 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Brown 821 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), , 342-43, cert.
State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), 343 .
State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), (mandatory life sentence under the Habitual Offender Law).
State v. Harbor 817 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , p. 8, 709 So.2d at 676-677 .
State v. Hicks 817 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[20] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Keeley 814 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3266 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Payton 810 So. 2d 1127 La. 2002
4 Cir. 3/11/98) , and our holding in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. George 829 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Dillon 812 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), 345 ; State v. Johnson, supra ; State v. Dorthey, supra .
State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , p. 8, 709 So.2d at 676-677 .
State v. Knight 811 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Parker 812 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[6] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Rice 807 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Bowen 806 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[17] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Mims 806 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey , 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State v. Kempton 806 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Richthofen 803 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.6/1/99), , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Davis 801 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), , mandated that the guidelines set forth in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , govern the review of mandatory minimum sentencing under an excessive sentence claim.
State v. Sprinkle 801 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.6/1/99), , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. O'NEAL 795 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
In the recent case of State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), , the supreme court strongly clarified the law in regard to the method to be utilized by the courts in determining whether a minimum life sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Kirkland 798 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra .
State v. Decay 798 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676 .
State v. Finney 798 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
[7] In State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), -43 , the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the current jurisprudence relating to the issue of sentencing below the statutory minimum of the multiple offender law: The Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitution to define conduct
State v. Cushinello 792 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Flagg 792 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), , the Supreme Court discussed what it characterized as the "rare" circumstances where a sentence lower than the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law is required to be imposed because imposition of the mandatory sentence would be excessive under the Louisiana Constitution.
State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Davis 786 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Dorthey, supra.
State v. Howard 786 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Dorthey, supra.
State ex rel. D.L.S. 788 So. 2d 1197 La. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Very recently the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the use of Dorthey to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), [5] , on remand to, State v. Webster, 98-0807 (La.
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00); .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Hensley 781 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .