DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 778 So. 2d 1131.

42 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Cedrick Stroughter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    1/29/01), State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaiden Kephart La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    1/29/01), State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    1/29/01), a nineteen-year old first offender was charged with first degree murder following the death of his twenty-two month old daughter.
  • State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1/29/01), , a nineteen-year old first offender was charged with first degree murder following the death of his twenty-two month old daughter.
  • State v. Minnieweather 251 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    1/29/01), ; State v. Reynolds , 1998-2281 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tristain D. Bartley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1/29/01), was charged with the first degree murder of his twenty-two-month-old daughter.
  • State v. Bartley 165 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In another case, the defendant in State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), , was charged with the first degree murder of his twenty-two-month-old daughter.
  • State of Louisiana v. Monique Renee Houston La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Woods 115 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See State v. Jones, 1999-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Harris 105 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 5/29/07) ; ; State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01); (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. GLAUB 66 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Jones, 99-2207, p. 3 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Bruce 54 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Jones, 99-2207, p. 3 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Ayche 978 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Lagarde, 960 So.2d at 1117 (citing State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), ).
  • State v. Lagarde 960 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [36] State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Batiste 958 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Lemon 951 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Butler 948 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland Joseph Peltier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Galliano 945 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    1/29/01), , recognized that the legislature's addition of second degree cruelty to juveniles in 1999 reflected "the seriousness with which the legislature requires courts to consider the criminal neglect of children which produces serious bodily injury or significant neurological consequences even when that conduct does not bri
  • State v. Robinson 930 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    [4] We recognize that State v. Jones, 1999-2207 (La.1/29/01), , and State v. Guzman, supra, hold that error patent review is not available for violations of La.
  • State v. Williams 926 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    *675 State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Jones 924 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [9] State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), (per curiam) [10] State v. Le, 98-1274 (La.App.
  • State v. Polizzi 924 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Scott 927 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In State v. Jones, 99-2207, p. 6 (La.1/29/01), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “the legislature’s subsequent changes in pertinent law remain a relevant sentencing consideration within the limits fixed by law at the time of the commission of the crime.” (Emphasis added.)
  • State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), (per curiam) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Shannon 902 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    The question presented when reviewing a defendant’s sentence is not “whether another sentence would have been more appropriate but whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion.” State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [30] State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Lawson 885 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Uloho 875 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Adair 875 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Fletcher 845 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that the question presented when reviewing a defendant’s sentence is not “whether another sentence would have been more appropriate but whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion.” State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Everidge 834 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Jones, 99-2207, p. 6 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Perkins 831 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Fairley 822 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [6] State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Martin 822 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Jones, 99-2207, p. 6 (La.1/29/01), (per cu-riam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “the legislature’s subsequent changes in pertinent law remain a relevant sentencing consideration within the limits fixed by law at the time of the commission of the crime.” Louisiana Revised Statute 24:171 provides: The repeal of any law shall not have the
  • State v. Cook 820 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/29/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "the legislature's subsequent changes in pertinent law remain a relevant sentencing consideration within the limits fixed by law at the time of the commission of the crime."
  • State v. Neely 818 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Jones, 1999-2207 (La.1/29/01), .
  • State v. Ventress 817 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    1/30/01 [1/29/01]), ; (La.
  • State v. Flagg 815 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See also: State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.1/30/01)
  • State v. Sugasti 802 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Jones, 99-2207 (La.App.1/29/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "the legislature's subsequent changes in pertinent law remain a relevant sentencing consideration within the limits fixed by law at the time of the commission of the crime."