Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 772 So. 2d 78.

303 citing documents.

  • State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La, 10/17/00), , 83.
  • State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Irvin 259 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Perry 250 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Banks 241 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/17/00), , 83 ; State v. Washington , 03-1135 (La.App.
  • State v. Wells 241 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Cousin 240 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Banks 240 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Nevers-Hawkins 229 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.
  • State v. Golden 223 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Saulny 220 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Hawkins 219 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Dunn 208 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Speaks 204 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    10/17/00); ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.App.
  • State v. Sayles 206 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. White 206 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Gardner 204 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Toliver 205 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thomas 192 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State v. Serigne 193 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Marcantel, supra (citing State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Hutchinson 190 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. McKinney 194 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Bland 194 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    An appellate court is constitutionally precluded from acting as a “thirteenth juror” in assessing the weight of the evidence, see State v. Mitchell, 1999-3342 (La.10/17/00), , and the trial court is precluded from doing the same when the trier of fact has reached a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence.
  • State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Paul 185 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Wallace 185 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    10/17/00), (citing State v. Davis, 92-1623, (La.
  • State v. McGhee 179 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    As previously noted by the supreme court, this court “must evaluate the evidence in a light nlost favorable to the [Sjtate and determine whether [a] possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable Indoubt.” State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (citing State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), , cert.
  • State v. Allen 177 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); , the Louisiana Supreme Court declared: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a the Defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” ...
  • State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Brenckle 170 So. 3d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court declared: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hy-^ pothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” ...
  • State v. Williams 170 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State v. Griffin 169 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State v. Baham 169 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State v. Shepherd 166 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Gorman 166 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Estes 168 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Stipe 167 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Dibartolo 168 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Wall 209 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Gillum 165 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .