Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 772 So. 2d 78.
-
State v. Vaughn
259 So. 3d 1048
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La, 10/17/00), , 83.
- State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Irvin 259 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Perry 250 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
State v. Banks
241 So. 3d 1240
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 83 ; State v. Washington , 03-1135 (La.App.
- State v. Wells 241 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Cousin 240 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Banks 240 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Nevers-Hawkins
229 So. 3d 1021
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.
- State v. Golden 223 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Saulny
220 So. 3d 871
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
- State v. Hawkins 219 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Dickerson 218 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Dunn 208 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
State v. Speaks
204 So. 3d 1167
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
10/17/00); ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.App.
- State v. Sayles 206 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. White 206 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Gardner 204 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Toliver 205 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
State v. Thomas
192 So. 3d 291
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
-
State v. Serigne
193 So. 3d 297
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Marcantel, supra (citing State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Hutchinson
190 So. 3d 1264
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. McKinney
194 So. 3d 699
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Bland
194 So. 3d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
An appellate court is constitutionally precluded from acting as a “thirteenth juror” in assessing the weight of the evidence, see State v. Mitchell, 1999-3342 (La.10/17/00), , and the trial court is precluded from doing the same when the trier of fact has reached a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence.
-
State v. Law
189 So. 3d 1164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Paul
185 So. 3d 188
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
-
State v. Wallace
185 So. 3d 795
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Johnson
182 So. 3d 378
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
-
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/17/00), (citing State v. Davis, 92-1623, (La.
-
State v. McGhee
179 So. 3d 739
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As previously noted by the supreme court, this court “must evaluate the evidence in a light nlost favorable to the [Sjtate and determine whether [a] possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable Indoubt.” State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (citing State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), , cert.
-
State v. Allen
177 So. 3d 771
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Hernandez
177 So. 3d 342
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); , the Louisiana Supreme Court declared: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a the Defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” ...
-
State v. Brown
173 So. 3d 1262
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Brenckle
170 So. 3d 1141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court declared: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hy-^ pothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” ...
-
State v. Williams
170 So. 3d 1129
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
-
State v. Griffin
169 So. 3d 473
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
-
State v. Baham
169 So. 3d 558
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. McClure
169 So. 3d 510
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00); .
-
State v. Shepherd
166 So. 3d 1041
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Gorman
166 So. 3d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Estes
168 So. 3d 847
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Rapp
161 So. 3d 103
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Stipe
167 So. 3d 942
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Dibartolo
168 So. 3d 754
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
-
State v. Wall
209 So. 3d 962
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Gillum
165 So. 3d 924
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .