Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 772 So. 2d 78.

303 citing documents.

State v. Suggs 81 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.App.
State v. Hernandez-Zuniga 81 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
State v. Patterson 78 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Adams 78 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Ballew 78 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Terrance 80 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Darrell W. Westmoreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Westmoreland 63 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
to determine whether a defendant’s suggested hypothesis creates an exculpatory explanation of the events, but is to “evaluate the 17evidence in a light most favorable to the state and determine whether the possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Cambrice 64 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Naquin 61 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
State v. Wright 61 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. *97 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 61 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.App.
State v. Bazley 60 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Bruce 54 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jason Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
10/17/00), (citation omitted).
State v. Miller 49 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“[Sjpecific intent to inflict great bodily harm may support a conviction for murder, but in order to support a conviction for attempted murder, only specific intent to kill is sufficient.” State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), (citation omitted).
State v. Loper 48 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 8 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. White 44 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 43 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00); ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Mitchell 40 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Mickel 41 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. LANDOR 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. LOUP 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana v. Muller 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Spring 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Joseph 30 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), (quotation omitted).
State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Constance 25 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Favors 28 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Griffin 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Thompson 22 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Morris 22 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following precepts for appellate review of circumstantial evidence in connection with review of the sufficiency of the evidence: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory ex
State v. McKemie 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Cochran 19 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Stogner 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith 13 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7
State v. Rios 7 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.02/25/08), ; State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), (Lemmon, J, concurring).
State v. Brown 4 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), (Lemmon, J, concurring).
State v. Terrell 9 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Jones 4 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
P. art. 821; State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), (Lemmon, J, concurring).
State v. Brunet 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wilkerson 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Carmen 3 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rather, the reviewing court must “determine whether the possible alternative hypothesis is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Babineaux 8 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Washington, 03-1135 (La.App.
State v. JUDEH 2 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Lowe 994 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008