DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mitchell, 772 So. 2d 78.

303 citing documents.

  • State v. Woodhead 866 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Lee 864 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Echeverria 862 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Terrick 857 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 9 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Fisher 852 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented: On appeal, the reviewing court "does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events."
  • State v. Billard 852 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Turner 850 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented: On appeal, the reviewing court "does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events."
  • State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Robinson 846 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 9 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Dauzart 844 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented: On appeal, the reviewing court "does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events."
  • State v. Booker 839 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, pp. 10-11 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Green 839 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Amin 839 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , 83 Ultimately, all evidence, both direct and circumstantial, must be sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Qutoum 839 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Gilbert 839 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Williams, 99-223, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Marcantel, supra ; State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Owens, 30,903 (La.App.
  • State v. Conner 833 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560, 573 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Williams, 99-223, p. 6 (La.
  • State v. Robinson 831 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Steele 829 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Karam 834 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00); .
  • State v. Percy 822 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [4] State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Logan 822 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Joseph 817 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Rivers 817 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Marcantel 815 So. 2d 50 La. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Gordon 809 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Young 800 So. 2d 847 La. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , quoting State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), .
  • State v. Saylor 802 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [4] State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Daniels 803 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Davis 818 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 8 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Kirkland 798 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Andy 793 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00)
  • State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    On appeal of the sufficiency of the evidence, the court rejected as unreasonable the hypothesis that a work crew-member left the crack in the van because “the drugs were worth too much to just be abandoned.” In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the circumstantial evidence-reasonable hypothesis of innocence rule, stating: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford a
  • State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Mitchell 808 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    [2] In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed this court's decision and remanded the case so we could address defendant's remaining assignments of error.
  • State v. Lovick 788 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the circumstantial evidence-reasonable hypothesis of innocence rule, stating: On appeal, the reviewing court “does not determine whether another possible hypothesis suggested by a defendant could afford an exculpatory explanation of the events.” State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/
  • State v. Sumling 786 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Evans 786 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that defendant's untruthful statement to the police following the crime supported a "guilty mind," and, although that was not enough in and of itself to convict defendant, the Supreme Court found that defendant's dishonesty was admissible to show intent.
  • State v. Lee 787 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), .
  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Moreover, recently in State v. Mitchell, 99-3342, pp. 7-8 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [I]n order for a reviewing court to reverse a conviction based on an alternative hypothesis of innocence, the court must find that the jury could not have negated a potential alternative hypothesis....
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “The actual trier of fact’s rationalities credibility calls, evidence weighing, and inference drawing are preserved ...
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Mitchell, 99-3342 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "The actual trier of fact's rationalities credibility calls, evidence weighing, and inference drawing are preserved ...