Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dank, 764 So. 2d 148.

16 citing documents.

State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , ; State v. Biagas, 99-2652, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/24/00), , this Court explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/24/00), , 155 recitations omitted).
State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , ; State v. Biagas, 99-2652, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Herrington 961 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , , this Court explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , , this Court explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Legendre 942 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , ; State v. Biagas, 1999-2652, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Cambrice 884 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 5/24/2000) , , this Court *632 explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Davis 859 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
App. 4 Cir. 5/24/2000), , this Court explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Carey 847 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 5/24/2000) , , this Court explained the factors a reviewing court must consider in determining whether an investigatory stop was permissible.
State v. Jones 839 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
App. 4 Cir. 5/24/00), -155 , this court addressed the issue of reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop of a suspect: La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Handy 828 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065 (La.App.
State v. Foster 828 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 5/24/00), -155 , this court addressed the issue of reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop of a suspect: La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Frank 804 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 5/24/00), -155 , this court addressed the issue of reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop of a suspect: La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 5/24/00) , (quoting State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), ).