Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Frank, 803 So. 2d 1.

65 citing documents.

State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
See e.g., State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), (78 out of 124 (62% of the venire members) "responded they had some exposure" to the case); State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), (110 out of 113 (97% of the venire members) "had been exposed to some publicity surrounding the case"); [10] Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 555 (72 out of 90 "prospective jurors [80%] had awareness of the case before trial"); State v. Connolly, 96-2680, p. 5, (La.7/1/97), (although 86.33% (120 out of 139) pot
State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Clark, supra, at 1057 , citing State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.01/17/01), .
State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[25] 99-0553, p. 19 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Lee 879 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In State v. Frank, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/01), , the Supreme Court noted that the specific issue of what showing an indigent needs to make in order to obtain state-funded expert assistance was addressed in detail in Touchet .
State of Louisiana v. Chet K. Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Whatley 858 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Frank, 99-553 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Bright 860 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Frank, 99-553 (La.1/17/01), -20 ; State v. Parent, 02-835 (La.App.
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 7 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 18 (La.4/16/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Wessinger, 98-1234, p. 9 (La.5/28/99), (statutorily superceded in part by La.
State v. George 855 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.06/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.01/17/01), ; appeal after remand
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 11 (La.1/17/01), (citations omitted).
State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
[3] Recently, in State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.4/16/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
[4] In State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/14/01), -20 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. Williams 828 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), ; Mamon, supra .
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
[6] " Recently, in State v. Frank, 99-05 (La.4/16/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
State v. Frank , 99-0553, p. 22, -21 .