DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 766 So. 2d 501.

512 citing documents.

  • State v. Day 915 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. Runyon 916 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Wardsworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Wardsworth 904 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00); .
  • Louisiana Electorate of Gays & Lesbians, Inc. v. Connick 902 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • LOUISIANA ELECTORATE OF GAYS v. Connick 902 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • Boone v. Boone 899 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In support she cites State v. Smith, 99-2015 (La.7/6/00), and City of New Orleans v. Board of Comm'rs, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), .
  • State v. Vallery 899 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00); .
  • State of Louisiana v. John Alden Vallery, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Citizen 898 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
    ("[w]here the legislature has provided an adequate method [for paying expenses incurred in enforcing indigent defendant's right to compel attendance] and there is no necessity shown for departure from it, the court must follow the statutory mandate."); cf. State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), (responsibility of court to enforce laws rather than legislate).
  • State v. Collins 896 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Dwayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00)
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Theriot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00)
  • State v. Theriot 893 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. Thomas 891 So. 2d 1233 La. 2005
    State v. Smith, 99-0606, p. 17, (La.7/6/00), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982, p. 9 (La.5/22/95), ; see also State v. Neal, 500 * (Punishment of one type of conduct more severely than another similar type of conduct is not, of itself, an equal protection violation.).
  • State of Louisiana v. Damien D. Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00)
  • State v. Carter 888 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606, pp. 5-6 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00)
  • State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin Mathew Burnaman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00)
  • State v. Burnaman 872 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. White 872 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. Perrilloux 864 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Smith, 99-606 (La.7/6/00), , reh'g denied, 99-2015 (La.8/31/00), .
  • State v. Smith 846 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    See, also, the recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00); .
  • St. Mary Anesthesia v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. 836 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    [14] See State v. Smith, 99-0606, 99-2015, 99-2019, 99-2094, pp. 10-12 (La.7/6/00), ("[O]ur constitution is not ...
  • Louisiana Electorate of Gays & Lesbians, Inc. v. State 833 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    On July 6, 2000, the Louisiana Supreme Court rendered an opinion in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , finding La.
  • LA ELECTORATE OF GAYS & LESBIANS, INC. v. State 812 So. 2d 626 La. 2002
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. Weaver 805 So. 2d 166 La. 2002
    Cf. State v. Fleury, 01-0871 (La.10/16/01), (shoplifting statute providing for more severe penalties than the general theft statute not violative of equal protection given widespread problem of retail theft); State v. Smith, 99-0606, p. 17 (La.7/6/00), (punishing solicitation of crimes against nature, i.e., anal or oral sex, more harshly than solicitation of prostitution does not violate the equal protection clause); State v. Carter, 99-0779, pp. 16-17 (La.App.
  • State v. Edwards 787 So. 2d 981 La. 2001
    State v. Smith, 99-0606, (La.07/6/00), .
  • State v. Lacy 782 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), .
  • State v. Stevenson 778 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    However, defendant acknowledges in her appellate brief that the Louisiana Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. Smith, 99-0606, 99-2094, 99-2015, 99-2019 (La.7/6/00), , where the Court upheld similar challenges to the constitutionality of La.
  • State v. Woods 772 So. 2d 640 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Gressett 772 So. 2d 646 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Clarady 772 So. 2d 646 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , *647 regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Smith 772 So. 2d 639 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Stansberry 772 So. 2d 646 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Scott 772 So. 2d 637 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Smith 772 So. 2d 637 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Monnie 772 So. 2d 637 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Huff 772 So. 2d 638 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Bailey 772 So. 2d 638 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Alexie 772 So. 2d 638 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Harris 772 So. 2d 639 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Jones 772 So. 2d 645 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Murphy 772 So. 2d 640 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Hebert 772 So. 2d 640 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. James 772 So. 2d 641 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Benjamin 772 So. 2d 641 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Williams 772 So. 2d 641 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.
  • State v. Williams 772 So. 2d 642 La. 2000
    For the reasons assigned in State v. Smith, 99-0606 (La.7/6/00), , regarding La.R.S.