Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 769 So. 2d 28.

35 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Corey Stevenson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 6/21/00), (“a police officer should be permitted to frisk a suspect following an investigatory stop [based on reasonable suspicion] relating to drug activities”); see also Lazard, 2008-0677, p. 6, at 496 (finding that the officers were justified in conducting a pat-down search of the defendant for weapons where
State v. Boyles 157 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Greenberry 141 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Gayden 133 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/21/2000) , (summarizing Louisiana 4th Circuit and Supreme Court jurisprudence finding that a plea of guilty to La.Rev.Stat.
State v. Ross 115 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -39 (stating that suspicion of drug dealing itself is an articulable fact that may support a frisk pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
State ex rel. T.H. 106 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , (testimony indicated defendant in possession of crack cocaine an hour before defendant was arrested for possession with the intent to distribute was it was admissible as res gestae); State v. Salter, 31,633 (La.App.
State v. Lampton 95 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Golden 95 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Harveston 71 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Brown 32 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 6/21/00), , this Court explained that, in order to justify a frisk of a suspect for weapons following an investigatory stop, a police officer does not need to be absolutely certain that the suspect is armed, but the facts must justify a belief that the officer’s safety or that of others is in danger, citing State v. William
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Lazard 2 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/21/00), , quoting State v. Williams, 98-3059, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -37 , writ denied, 2000-2183 (La.9/28/01), .
State v. Brown 895 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , ; State v. Smiley, 99-0065 (La.App.
State v. Craft 870 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -39 ; Bradley, supra (noting the acknowledged "drug trade-weapons" connection).
State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Morgan 830 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
this court recognized a drug trade-weapons connection, stating: |9...
State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Jarvis 811 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 6/21/00), , writ denied, 2000-2183 (La.9/28/01), ; State v. Mims, 97-1500, p. 24 (La.App.
State v. Isidore 789 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/21/00), -87 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 784 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Howard 787 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , -37 ; State v. Littles, 98-2517 (La.App.
State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/21/00) , , quoting State v. Ragas , 98-0011 at pp. 13-14, 744 So.2d at 106-107 , quoting State v. Egana, 97-0318, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 6/21/00), ; State v. Mims, 97-1500, p. 24 (La.App.
State v. Dawson 773 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 Cir. 6/21/00), ; State v. Mims, 97-1500, p. 24 (La.App.