Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 781 So. 2d 1205.

36 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    1/17/01), (“The party seeking to exclude the [prospective] juror has the burden to demonstrate, through questioning, that the [prospective] juror lacks impartiality.”).
  • State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    1/17/01), (holding that “[t]he party seeking to exclude the [prospective] juror has the burden to demonstrate, through questioning, that the [prospective] juror lacks impartiality.”) 10 that discretion in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner to prejudice Defendant.
  • State v. Harris 274 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1/17/01), , 1214 (holding that "[t]he party seeking to exclude the [prospective] juror has the burden to demonstrate, through questioning, that the [prospective] juror lacks impartiality.") In argument to this court, Defendant relies on State v. Mitchell , (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
    1/17/01), State v. Hallal, 557 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
    1/17/01), (“The party seeking to 6 Prospective juror number 20 testified as follows: The Court: Have you or any close friends or relatives been a victim of a crime?
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
    1/17/01); illustrates the distinction between a juror’s refusal to consider a mitigating circumstance versus a juror’s inclination to weigh a mitigating circumstance unfavorably in the eyes of the defendant.
  • State v. Nellum 136 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Taylor, 991311, p. 13 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 13 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 8 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 13 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    This Court affirmed the conviction and death sentence in State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Nelson 39 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 5/26/09), (citing State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 13 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Butler 15 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    416 , 154 L.Ed.2d 297 (2002); Howard, supra ; Gradley; supra; State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    See State v. Draughn, 05-1825 (La.1/17/07), ; Bridgewater, supra ; Jacobs, supra; State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), ; Howard, supra ; Gradley; supra; State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), ; Baldwin, supra .
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    Tate, supra; State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 11 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Parker 901 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Robinson 896 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 , (2003) ( quoting State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ishmel Joel Ennis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Ennis 877 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 6 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Bailey 875 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    1859, 1866 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991); State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 5 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 875 So. 2d 58 La. 2004
    See e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
  • State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 8 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Alexander 871 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    at 1724, n. 21 ; State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
    This Court affirmed the conviction and death sentence in State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 7 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131, p. 6 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
  • State v. Duplessy 853 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    This federal case was cited with apparent approval by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 11 (La.1/17/01), -17 .
  • State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 8 (La.1/17/01), , cert.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    Legally, this court rejected a similar argument in State v. Taylor , 99-1311 at p. 5 (La.1/17/01), , stating that "although the voir dire responses of [the striken] prospective juror Porter are not markedly different from other venire-persons who actually sat on the jury, the defendant fails to show that the trial court erred when it accepted the state's race-neutral explanation for the strike."
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311, p. 8 (La.1/17/01), .
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Harper, 93-2682 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 at p. 6 (La.1/17/01), -13 (noting that one African-American was on the actual jury and that the state had not exhausted all of its peremptory challenges); State v. Tart , 93-0772 p. 18 (La.2/9/96), (acknowledging that mere presence of African-American jurors does not defeat a Batson *553 claim, yet capital case unan
  • State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), .