Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jacobs, 789 So. 2d 1280.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), State v. Cross, 93-1189 La.6/30/95), State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), , 1284 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), , 686 ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), , 534 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , 1280.
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/01), , 1284 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Jacobs, 99–1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), State v. Cross, 93–1189 La.6/30/95), State v. Maxie, 93–2158 (La.4/10/95), State v. Robertson, 92–2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
6/29/01), -84: In State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.
State v. Boyd 104 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), (“[A] defendant need only show two things to constitute reversible error: (1) that the trial judge erred in refusing to sustain a challenge for cause by the defendant; and (2) that the 14defendant exhausted all of his peremptory challenges.”).
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. *237 Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01); (citing Robertson, 96-2660 at 4, 630 So.2d at 1281 ).
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 2 (La.6/29/01), -83 .
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Jacobs, 1999-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jacobs, 1999-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), -83 .
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003) [34] ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; [35] State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
6/29/01), (error to deny a challenge for cause to two prospective jurors who expressed a pro-death sentiment, where there was no attempt to rehabilitate them and voir dire was devoid of any meaningful discussion by the state, defense counsel, or the trial judge of the role mitigating circumstances play in Louisiana's bifurcated
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
art. 921; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
See State v. Jacob, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Jones 884 So. 2d 582 La. 2004
State v. Jacobs, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Taylor 875 So. 2d 58 La. 2004
See e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Jones 862 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 7 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131, p. 6 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
State v. Taylor 850 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 4 (La.16/29/01), .
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
In State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), , we reversed Jacobs' conviction and sentence due to voir dire error and remanded for a new trial.
State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
See also State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (a trial judge's ruling on a challenge for cause will be reversed only when a review of the entire voir dire reveals that the trial court abused its discretion).