DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jason, 779 So. 2d 865.

23 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Mitchell A. Flemming, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 12/6/00), writ denied, 01-37 (La.
  • State v. Flemming 194 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , writ denied, 01-37 (La.11/9/01), ).
  • State v. Jones 178 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    4th Cir.12/6/00), , writ denied, 2001-0037 (La.11/9/01), .
  • State v. Bailey 126 So. 3d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , this Court recognized that the prosecutor’s statement — that it was defense counsel’s job to attack the credibility of the State’s witnesses — was not improper.
  • State v. Holmes 106 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir.12/6/00), , writ denied, 01-0037 (La.11/9/01), .
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    4th Cir.12/6/00), writ denied, 01-0037 (La.11/9/01), the court held that a typographical error in the habitual offender bill of information which listed the wrong date of one of the defendant’s convictions was not prejudicial to the defendant because it contained the correct case number
  • State v. Boutte 58 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4th Cir.12/6/00), , writ denied, 01-0037 (La.11/9/01), , the court held that a typographical error in the habitual offender bill of information which listed the wrong date of one of the defendant’s convictions was not prejudicial to the defendant because it contained the correct case number and section of court.
  • State v. Green 52 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , the defendant likewise argued that proof of evidence of his previous guilty plea was Ininsufficient because the plea form did not contain the judge’s signature.
  • State v. Briggs 19 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Conner 996 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 4 Cir.12/6/00), , this court found that a typographical error in the multiple bill that listed the wrong date of one of the defendant's convictions was not prejudicial to the defendant.
  • State v. Carey 901 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    4th Cir.12/6/00), , writ denied, 01-0037 (La.11/9/01), , the court held that a typographical error in the habitual offender bill of information which listed the wrong date of one of the defendant's convictions was not prejudicial to the defendant because it contained the correct case number and section of court.
  • State v. Vance 879 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , the defense argued the State made an improper statement in closing argument when the prosecutor commented that the defense counsel’s job was to show the State’s witnesses were lying.
  • State v. Harris 859 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , 871 citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Finch 853 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , 871 citing Strickland v. Washington, supra, stated that the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two-part test of Strickland .
  • State v. Phillips 853 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 12/6/00), , stated that the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two-part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stevenson 839 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.12/16/00), , writ denied, 01-0037 (La.11/9/01), .
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/9/01), , the defendant moved to change his plea to not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity on the morning of trial.
  • State v. Perez 831 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , writ denied, 01-37 (La.11/9/01)
  • State v. Porche 819 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Barnes 800 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 12/6/00) , , citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Singleton 801 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Varnado 798 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.12/6/00), , the Fourth Circuit found that a typographical error in the multiple bill which listed the wrong date of one of defendant's convictions was not prejudicial to the defendant.