Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duncan, 802 So. 2d 533.

42 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Jason Leon Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
10/ 16/ 01), - 50, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Isaiah M. Childs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Jaquan Battley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Joey Ray Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/16/01), (footnote omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 12 (La.10/16/01), (quoting Batson, 476 U.S at 96, 106 S.Ct.
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Jerrell Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Michael Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
at 1723; State v. Duncan, 23 99-2615, p. 13 (La.10/16/01)
Rosa Belle Gros v. LAMMICO, Eric Jukes, M.D., and Karl Gerald Haydel, Sr., M.D. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/16/01), , 544 (quoting Batson , 476 U.S. at 96 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Simon 245 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jerome Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Sparks, 68 So.3d at 468-89; State v. Duncan, 1999-2615 (La.10/16/01)
State v. Guillory 206 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rodgers 202 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Sparks, 68 So.3d at 468-89; State v. Duncan, 1999-2615 (La.10/16/01)
State v. Broussard 201 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. McKinney 194 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), , cert.
State v. Harrison 147 So. 3d 161 La. 2014
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), (“demonstrative evidence, including photographs, may also be offered for its circumstantial value, i.e., as the basis or an inference beyond those facts which are perceivable.”).
State v. Henderson 135 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 24 (La.10/16/01), , cert.
State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Sparks, 68 So.3d at 468-89 ; State v. Duncan, 1999-2615 (La.10/16/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In support of this argument, he cites State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), , cert, denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
Sparks, 68 So.3d at 468-89 ; State v. Duncan, 1999-2615 (La.10/16/01), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Anderson, 06-2987 (La.9/9/08), ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, (La.10/16/01), ; State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; (first degree murder occurred in Lafayette Parish, case transferred to Ouachita Parish on change of venue).
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
10/16/01), , the Court found that the Caucasian defendant had failed to establish a prima facie case of discriminatory strikes against African-American venire persons despite his conviction at the hands of a jury that contained eleven Caucasians and one African-American.
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
476 U.S. at 96-97 , 106 S.Ct at 1723 ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 13 (La.10/16/01); .
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 12 (La.10/16/01), (quoting Batson, 476 U.S at 96, 106 S.Ct.
State v. Prejean 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Mims 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Duncan, 1999-2615 (La.10/16/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Lekeithen Shondell Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Harris 924 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
esence of three factors, namely: the prosecutor’s peremptory challenges were directed at members of cognizable racial and gender groups, the challenges were peremptory and not for cause, and a showing of “circumstances sufficient to raise an inference that the prosecutor struck the venire person on account of being a member of that cognizable group.” State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 12 (La.10/16/01), , cert.
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 27 (La.10/16/01), .
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
1745 , 161 L.Ed.2d 612 (2005); State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 27 (La.10/16/01), -553 ; State v. Tart, 93-0772 p. 18 (La.2/9/96), .
State v. Bailey 875 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
art. 795(B)(1); State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 17 (La.10/16/01), -547 , cert.
State v. Perrilloux 864 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
In State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court observed the following regarding the selection of a token number of persons from the cognizable racial group: Although we agree with defendant that the mere presence of some African-Americans on the jury is no bar to find a prima facie case, we also recognize, as the state contends
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992), and by this court in several cases, including Ball, Taylor, Ross, and State v. Duncan, 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), .
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 40 (La.5/14/02), ___ So.2d ___, ___; State v. Deal, 00-0434, p. 17 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 38 (La.10/16/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 36 (La.4/23/99), ; Letulier , 97-1360 at p. 27, 750 So.2d at 800 ; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 31 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609, p. 23 (La.10/21/97), ; Connolly, 96-1680 at p. 19, 700 So.2d at 823; State v. Davis
State v. Rodriguez 822 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 14 (La.10/16/01), .
State v. Royal 807 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[9] 99-2615 (La.10/16/01), [10] Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-97 , 106 S.Ct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by