DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hollins, 742 So. 2d 671.

49 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gladue Joseph Istre A/K/A Joey Istre La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99), writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Darren K. Lloyd La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99); writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Perry Bell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99), writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Shawn Michael McKinney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99), writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01)
  • State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , 682, writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State v. Kent 178 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Baskin 169 So. 3d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Griffin 167 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), ).
  • State v. McClure 165 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Moore 134 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Shed, 36,321 (La.App.2d Cir.9/18/02), , writ denied, 2002-3123 (La.12/19/03), ; State v. Hollins, 99-278 (La.App.5th Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 1999-2853 (La.
  • State v. Abdul 131 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Wise 128 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Bannister 88 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. BOITEUX 81 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Simmons 67 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , the court affirmed a defendant’s conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute where the defendant was discovered to be in possession of nineteen individually wrapped pieces of crack cocaine.
  • State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.
  • State v. Jones 33 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 8/81/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Johnson 9 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/02), .
  • State v. Speed 2 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    5th Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), ; State v. Page, 96-227 (La.App.
  • State v. Falcon 956 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5th Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), , we found the jury charge relative to requisite intent was incorrect, but the error did not require reversal as the jury instructions as a whole correctly stated the law.
  • State v. Paul 924 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Gardner 907 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -683 , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), , this Court stated in pertinent part (citations omitted; footnote added): Generally, a party may not assign as error a complaint to a jury charge in the absence of a contemporaneous objection.
  • State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), ).
  • State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    App. 5 Cir. 8/31/99), , *1073 writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Collins 886 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5th Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Smith 868 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    5th Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.2/5/01), .
  • State v. Wuneburger 860 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    App. 5 Cir.8/31/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), , this Court, citing, summarized the burden of proof in habitual offender proceedings as follows: Where a prior conviction resulted from a guilty plea, the State must show that the defendant was advised of his constitutional r
  • State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5th Cir.9/1/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), this Court, (La.
  • State v. Walker 833 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -85 , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.01/05/01), , this Court set forth the pertinent law regarding the method to be used to prove the constitutionality of a plea: In proving the constitutionality of the plea, the State must produce either a "perfect" transcript of the Boykin colloquy between the defendant
  • State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Morris 798 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.9/1/99), , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/1/01), , 588.
  • State v. Balser 792 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -685 , writ denied, 99-2853 (La.1/5/01), .
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Monroe 784 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -685 , this court set forth the pertinent law regarding the method to be used to prove that a defendant is a habitual offender: To prove that a defendant is an habitual offender, the State must establish by competent evidence the prior felony convictions and that defendant is the same person who was convicted of t
  • State v. Sanders 784 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -685 , this court set forth the method to be used to prove that a defendant is an habitual offender: *22 To prove that a defendant is an habitual offender, the State must establish by competent evidence the prior felony convictions and that defendant is the same person who was convicted of the prior felonies.
  • State v. Harris 782 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 8/31/99), ; State v. Williams, 98-651, (La.App.
  • State v. Baker 776 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.8/31/99), ; State v. Bell, 97-1134 (La.
  • State v. Jordan 774 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , , in which this court addressed an identical situation and held, "Because this sentence was vacated coincidentally with the imposition of the enhanced sentence, we find no necessity to vacate the enhanced sentence."
  • State v. Jolly 768 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , -685 , this court, summarized the burden of proof in habitual offender proceedings as follows: Where a prior conviction resulted from a guilty plea, the State must show that the defendant was advised of his constitutional rights and that he knowingly waived those r
  • State v. East 768 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Neal 762 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Day 762 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Smith 760 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 8/31/99) , ; State v. Bell, 97-1134 (La.App.
  • State v. Stokes 759 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000