DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boles, 750 So. 2d 1059.

38 citing documents.

  • State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Jones 123 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Roca 866 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Mickel 864 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Woodward 844 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Charles 827 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 11/10/99) ; , writ denied, 00-2959 (La.8/24/01); .
  • State v. Steele 829 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jackson 820 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Ledesma 817 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Rivers 817 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Napoleon 811 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Williams 800 So. 2d 790 La. 2001
    5 Cir. 11/10/99) , (holding that under State v. Fraser, supra , an appellate court could not correct an illegally sentence because the State failed to appeal the issue); State v. Pugh, 99-851 (La.App.
  • State v. Liles 803 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lyons 802 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Crayton 796 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Egana 792 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    App. 5 Cir. 11/10/99), .
  • State v. Powell 783 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Ellwood 783 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lee 782 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 11/10/99), , we remand this case and order the trial judge to inform the defendant of the correct provisions of the article by sending appropriate written notice to him within ten days of the opinion and to file written *1068 proof in the record that defendant received same.
  • State v. Mason 782 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    App. 5th Cir.11/10/99), , that the amendment should be applied retroactively and a defendant, who was not informed of the prescriptive period for post-conviction relief, should be informed that the prescriptive period is two years.
  • State v. Lockett 775 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Cazenave 772 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    App. 5th Cir. 11/10/99), , that the amendment should be applied retroactively and that a defendant, who was not informed of the prescriptive period for post-conviction relief, should be informed that the prescriptive period is two years.
  • State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5th Cir. 11/10/99), , 1062 that the amendment should be applied retroactively and a defendant, who was not informed of the prescriptive period for post-conviction relief, should be informed that the prescriptive period is two years.
  • State v. Jordan 774 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    App. 5 Cir. 11/10/99), .
  • State v. Wilkinson 772 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. East 768 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Simmons 767 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Perrilloux 762 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Gilbert 760 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Joseph 759 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Joseph 759 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Smith 757 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Young 757 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Pugh 750 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999