Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hills, 761 So. 2d 516.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Press Shorter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Steven Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    5/16/00), State v. Merritt, supra.
  • State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    5/16/00), , 520 ; State v. Baudier , 00-1108, p. 6 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Fisher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    “A victim’s or eyewitness’s testimony alone is usually sufficient to support a verdict.” State v. Davis, 02–1043, p. 4 (La.6/27/03), State v. Hills, 99–1750, p. 8, n. 8 (La.5/16/00)
  • State v. Hunter 176 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See e.g., State v. Hills, 99-1750, pp. 5-6 (La.5/16/00), -21 .
  • State v. Day 119 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Phillips 111 So. 3d 1021 La. 2013
    See State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
    Lee , 05-2098 at pp. 44-45, 976 So.2d at 139 (allowing the admission of such evidence “particularly when the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged crime and uncharged offenses is so peculiarly distinctive one must logically say they were the work of the same person”); 69 State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), ; see, (other crimes evidence admissible where it showed similar distinctive handcuff ligature, overkill, |,^predominant use of a knife, and need for domination
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    By contrast, in State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), , the defendant was charged with the murder of a five-year-old girl who sustained sexual trauma.
  • State v. Duronslet 87 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), -21.
  • State v. Brunet 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Jones 985 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), -21 .
  • State v. Rose 949 So. 2d 1236 La. 2007
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 6 (La.5/16/00)
  • State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Davis, 02-1043, p. 4 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 8, n. 8 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Martin, 39,846 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Harris, 01-2730, p. 41 (La.1/19/05), , 1261 citing, State v. Davis, 02-1043, p. 4 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 8 n. 8 (La.5/16/00), , 522 n. 8.
  • State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/11/03), , writ denied, 03-0659 (La.6/6/03), (quoting State v. Hills, 99-1750, pp. 6-7 (La.5/16/00), ).
  • State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    5th Cir.06/26/02), , writ denied, 02-2088 (La.01/24/03), , superseded by statute as stated in State v. Zornes, 34,070 (La.App.2d Cir.04/03/02), ; State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.05/16/00), ; State v. Taylor, 37,356 (La.App.2d Cir.09/26/03), , writ denied, 03-3141 (La.03/19/04), .
  • State v. Merritt 877 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), 521 .
  • State v. Dauzart 844 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    See State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), and State v. Galliano, 02-2849 (La.1/10/03), .
  • State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Fortino 837 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See: State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Miller, 98-0301 (La.9/9/98), .
  • State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See also State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00)
  • State v. Morgan 830 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Spencer 802 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 8 (La.5/26/00), , footnote 8; State v. Allen, 94-1895, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “If credible, the testimony of a single witness may establish the elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” See State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 8 (La.5/16/00), , footnote 8; State v. Allen, 94-1895, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Morgan 791 So. 2d 100 La. 2001
    See State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), ("This Court has long sanctioned the use of other crimes evidence to show modus operandi as it bears on the question of identity when the prior crime is so distinctively similar to the one charged, especially in terms of the time, place and manner of commission, that one may reasonably infer that the same person
  • State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    art. 404 B; State v. Hills, 99-1750, (La.5/16/00), .
  • State in the Interest of RT 781 So. 2d 1239 La. 2001
    1923 , 144 L.Ed.2d 161 (1999); State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), n. 6 ; In re Pitre, 93-2322 (La.1/14/94), .
  • State Ex Rel. Rt 781 So. 2d 1239 La. 2001
    1923 , 144 L.Ed.2d 161 (1999); State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), n. 6 ; In re Pitre, 93-2322 (La.1/14/94), .
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Schleve 775 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), n. 6 .
  • State v. Dickerson 772 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    See State v. Hills, 99-1750 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Williams 769 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Hills, 99-1750, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .