Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ball, 756 So. 2d 275.

37 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerald Manchip White La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Alonzo D. Ragsdale La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Charles McQuarter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
11/30/99), the State contended that it is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choosing.
Diamond Fields and Gerald Sanford Versus Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
11/30/99), (citing Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 189, 117 S.Ct.
State Of Louisiana v. Leonardo Mastascuso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Sparks 271 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Dwayne Piper A/K/A Marcus Piper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
11/30/99), 2 Defendant’s next argument is that trial counsel should have requested a mistrial when a police officer, Wade Bourgeois, testified that Defendant stated, “This is why we fucking hate cops.
State v. Piper 269 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Cartwright 252 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
11/30/99), , 279, the defendant was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "telling the jury [that] the defendant is a prior felon ...
State v. Cox 239 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/30/99), , a prosecution for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the State could introduce evidence of the name and nature of the defendant's prior conviction of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, even though the defendant had offered to stipulate that he had been convicte
State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Powell 179 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
14:95.1; State v. Ball, 99-0428, p. 3 (La.11/30/99), -277 ; State v. Fields, 2012-0674, p. 6 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Eric Vercher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
205, 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987); State v. Ball, 99-428 (La.11/30/99)
State v. Vercher 162 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987); State v. Ball, 99-428 (La.11/30/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Wilford B. Vangure AKA Wilfred Vangure AKA Wilfred B. Vangure La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[T]he prosecution is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice” and a defendant “may not stipulate or admit his way out of the full evidentiary force of the case as the government chooses to present it.” State v. Ball, 99-428 (La.11/30/99), (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 186-87 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Beaulieu 122 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
14:95.1; State v. Ball, 99-0428, p. 3 (La.11/30/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 12/9/98), , aff'd, 99-428 (La.11/30/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jude Gilbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Gilbert 41 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
205 , 98 L.Ed.2d 156 (1987); State v. Ball, 99-428 (La.11/30/99), .
Criticized State v. Lomax 35 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Ball, 99-0428, (La.11/30/99), , declined to follow Old Chief , first because the United State Supreme Court’s decision was not based on constitutional principles which would be binding on the states, but instead was based on the specific language of 18 U.S.C., Section 922 , and second because the Louisiana statute defines the crime by specific enu
State v. Duhon 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Sims 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
11/30/99), , a prosecution for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the Supreme Court held that the State could introduce evidence of the name and nature of the defendant's prior conviction of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, even though the defendant had offered to stipulate that he had been convicted of a pri
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), ; State v. Brokenberry, 41,481 (La.App.
State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.12/9/98), , aff'd, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), .
State v. Whalen 963 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.12/9/98), , aff'd, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), .
State v. Benoit 885 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that "`[t]he State cannot be robbed of the moral force of its case merely because the stipulation is offered.'" State v. Ball, 99-428, p. 10 (La.11/30/99), ( cert.
State v. Shrader 881 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
2d Cir.12/9/98), , aff'd, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), .
State v. Bannister 882 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
In State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court had occasion to discuss the inherent prejudice to a defendant in cases where a predicate felony is an element of the crime.
State v. Willis 843 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), , the supreme court distinguished Old Chief in Louisiana prosecutions for violations of La.R.S.
State v. Washington 782 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), , the court held that in a prosecution for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the State could introduce evidence of the name and nature of the defendant's prior conviction, even though the defendant had offered to stipulate that he had been convicted of a prior felony.
State v. Washington 782 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), , the court held that in a prosecution for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the State could introduce evidence of the name and nature of the defendant’s prior conviction, even though the defendant had offered to stipulate that he had been convicted of a prior felony.
State v. Donald 775 So. 2d 1054 La. 2000
§ 922 (g)(1), felon in possession of a firearm); but see State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), (distinguishing Old Chief in Louisiana prosecutions for violations of La.R.S.
State v. Morris 770 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
14:95.1; State v. Ball, 99-0428, p. 3 (La.11/30/99), .
State v. Jackson 767 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Ball, 99-0428 (La.11/30/99), .