Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gilbert, 758 So. 2d 779.

14 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Jeremy Paul Sims La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
2/ 4/ 00), (pet- curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Andre Bell La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Runnels 101 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
15:529.1.” State v. Gilbert, 99-2338, p. 1 (La.2/4/00), -80 .
State v. Martinez 38 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See, State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), -80 .
State v. Riggins 885 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See, State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), (per curiam); State v. Parker, 00-1365, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Hardan 882 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See, State v. Gilbert, 99-2238 (La.2/4/00), (per curiam); State v. Parker, 00-1365, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Darensbourg 871 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), -780 , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: An appellate court ...
State v. Alexander 871 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), .
State v. Garrus 849 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
“Appeals are favored in law, and appeals should not be dismissed on hyper technical interpretations of a statute which can be reasonably interpreted to preserve the appeal, particularly in the absence of any claim of prejudice by the opposing party.” State v. Gilbert, 99-2838 (La.4/20/00), .
State v. Armant 839 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
see also, State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.4/20/00), .
State v. Gilliam 807 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See, State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00)
State v. Perrilloux 802 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), ; and the State does not contest the trial court's granting of the out-of-time appeal.
State v. Simmons 781 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Gilbert, 99-2338 (La.2/4/00), -780.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by