Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abel v. White, 430 So. 2d 202.

13 citing documents.

Champagne v. Ward 893 So. 2d 773 La. 2005
In its reasoning, (La.App.
Rains v. Jones 890 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Bell v. Farmer's Ins. Group 635 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
McLemore v. Fox 565 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Williams v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 524 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Urging reversal, (La.App.
George v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 471 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In written reasons, the trial court found that although the policy language “clearly allows the setoff,” the law applicable under an interest analysis was Louisiana's 22:1406 D. It further held, however, that the statute, by its terms, was properly applied only to policies issued and delivered in Louisiana, (La.App.
Cobb v. Burke 469 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Snider v. Murray 461 So. 2d 1051 La. 1985
Armstrong v. Land & Marine Applicators, Inc. 463 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Bloodworth v. Carroll 455 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Snider v. Kemper Ins. Co. 448 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Wilson v. State Farm Ins. Co. 448 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Richard v. Beacon Nat. Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983