Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hargrave v. Delaughter, 10 So. 3d 245.

14 citing documents.

Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Brian Mullen v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 3/4/09), –50, this court stated: The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Blanchard v. Ogima, 253 La.
Karen Sue Thibodeaux v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 249 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Richey v. Miller 247 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 3d Cir. 3/4/09), , 250.
Darius M. Jack v. Ralph A. McFarland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Jack v. McFarland 175 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Julia B. Voinche v. Joseph Beaud Capps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Voinche v. Capps 155 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Caldwell Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Co. 110 So. 3d 993 La. 2013
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Claudia Annette Senac v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/4/09), with respect to an employee who was paid a salary and concluded that “‘wages’ as contemplated by the supreme court [in Reed, ] refers to piecemeal or hourly wages rather than salary.
Senac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 22 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/4/09), , with respect to an employee who was paid a salary and concluded that ‘“wages’ as contemplated by the supreme court [in Reed, ] refers to piecemeal or hourly wages rather than salary.